Talk:Portal:Theories about Evolved Humans

re: Linderman's nationality

Naturalized U.S. citizens can (and do) serve in the U.S. military.--Hardvice (talk) 00:27, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

• Not during a time of the draft. Once the Armed Forces became a volunteer force, then naturalized citizens could volunteer as well. That's why the selective service is a requirement for all 18 year old male citizens who are not naturalized. As a member of the Armed Forces, I need to clarify that. --Bob 12:44, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

It might be a fake accent.JD 21:45, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Niki is a sleeper theory

how exactly is any of that stuff evidence, heroe? i'm going to revert your undone because its stupid to argue that any of that is evidence its not even written in an academic style.JD 21:45, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

Proven theories

on the theories portal it seemed the consense was to remove proven theories whats your reasoning for restoring them?JD 21:45, 24 March 2007 (EDT)

• I certainly wasn't aware of this consensus. Heroe(talk)
• I have to agree with Heroe on this one... Anomy 23:49, 24 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Personally, I like the idea of purging the theories that are proven. If somebody postulates an idea, and it's later proven correct, then it's no longer a theory, but instead it's just true. For instance, image somebody had just watched Genesis and wrote a theory like, "Peter's power is not flight, but the ability to absorb the powers of others." Reading that now, it's like, "Well duh!" There's no point to it on these theories pages. Some will argue that we should make a page for proven theories. That's fine, but isn't that what the whole site is anyway -- just facts? ... I like the idea of taking the proven "theories" off these pages simply because by definition, they're no longer theories. Plus, from a selfish standpoint, it makes cleaning up the pages a heckuva lot easier. :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:36, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
    • I have to agree. I have heard a lot of reasons to get rid of them, but I've yet to hear anyone defend keeping them. A discussion where everyone says the same thing is as good as a consensus, no?--Hardvice (talk) 00:47, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
      • Like Ryan and Hardvice i can't see why'd you need to keep them, and its also inconsistent with all the other theory pages, if you want them to reminise, then I would have a problem Proven Theories page, but i would again concur with Ryan, for example one theory i posted was that Malcolm McDowell would play Linderman, I can't see any point for that to remain since on the Linderman page it would be quite clear who played him. JD 07:43, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
        • I cant agree more. We should'nt keep proven theories, don't get the point of their utility... Pretty useless to write in two page the same thing (the real page of the char for exemple and the proven theories page). The only thing that this page could do is making peoples that have posted a theorie which have been proven glad :o --FrenchFlo(talk)(contribs) 09:19, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

Maintenance

Hey, I just made a huge edit re: consistency, spelling, grammar, links, etc. I also removed a few proven theories. If you want to put them back, go ahead, but do it in a new edit, please. And spellcheck yourself! Soleta 14:38, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

• Looks good. One thing to mention: you can do an internal link to an image (like the images of Charlie's birthday party) by preceding the word "image" with a colon ([[:Image:Charlie birthday 1.jpg|1]]). That's to be preferred over an external link to an internal image. In any case, thank you so much for your help cleaning up this page; it's not a task many of us look forward to. At this point, it looks like all this page will need to be considered "cleaned" is moving non-episode/graphic novel citations out of the 'Citation' column, and making sure that all citations are properly formatted and linked.--Hardvice (talk) 15:09, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

Hana's List

Since we know that Suresh's list, at least a vast chunk of it, was stored on his computer, and Hana can access all computer files, (and is only limited from data stored on paper), shouldn't this theory be moved to the Disproven Theories page? --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 03/27/2007 17:31 (EST)

• She can't access a computer that cannot connect to the internet or broadcast within her perceptive area. It's like any computer. Now, Chandra's computer in Chennai more than likely was connected to the internet, but the assumption that she can access any computer file is a bit naive.--Bob 19:05, 27 March 2007 (EDT)
  • Suresh had info on his computer of evolved people from all over the world. It would only be naive, to assume that his computer cannot connect to the internet. From prior info given, her 'perception' is worldwide because of the internet and satellites. Just trying to clean up some of the entries that's all. --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 03/27/2007 20:53 (EST)
    • From what we've seen of her powers, she has to "look" for information. To me, that makes me think she'd have to know about the list (which she may or may not) to know to look for it. It's certainly not beyond her abilities, but it's far from confirmed.--Hardvice (talk) 23:02, 27 March 2007 (EDT)