Talk:Theories:Powers: Difference between revisions
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
imported>Ted C trolling? |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Hehe. Hehe.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 7 March 2007 (EST) |
Hehe. Hehe.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 7 March 2007 (EST) |
||
==Steroid Niki== |
|||
The third "theory" under Enhanced Strength looks more like trolling than a serious theory. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 17:38, 29 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 21:38, 29 March 2007
Cleanup Notes
In case anybody has any questions about why information was moved out of the "Evidence" column: the evidence column is for evidence from canon sources only. Non-canon evidence, as well as base reasoning, belongs in the comment column. Basically, if you can't cite a specific moment from an episode or a graphic novel, it belongs in Comments, not Evidence. See Help:Theories and Spoilers.
If you feel information which was moved is supported by a canon source, please be sure to cite the specific example from a graphic novel or episode if you move the information back to the Evidence column. Also, "None" in the evidence column isn't a value judgment. Many theories which will probably end up true don't have specific information from episodes or graphic novels which can be cited at present. Please don't take it as a slight on your theory -- it's merely to make the tables consistent.--Hardvice (talk) 01:36, 11 February 2007 (EST)
Mind in the gutter
The combination of liquefaction and telekinesis should technically allow Sylar to reshape objects into potentially offensive shapes.
Hehe. Hehe.--Hardvice (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2007 (EST)
Steroid Niki
The third "theory" under Enhanced Strength looks more like trolling than a serious theory. --Ted C 17:38, 29 March 2007 (EDT)