User talk:Ice Vision

• Archive 1: January 2007 - November 2007

Special

• Thanks so so much for uploading that image! Great idea! I really appreciate it. :)--  Lost Soul   talk  contribs  11:47, 23 November 2007 (EST)
  • Thanks. I plan on expanding the page later. I really like the idea of the "special" page. Props to you.--Ice Vision 11:50, 23 November 2007 (EST)
    • Thanks a bunch. You did a great job with the information so far! I really appreciate the help! (I know I already said it, but who cares? :D) :)--  Lost Soul   talk  contribs  11:52, 23 November 2007 (EST)

Redirects

Is there a reason to prefer capitalizing redirect commands over keeping them lowercase? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2007 (EST)

• For some reason, the lowercase redirects don't work. After you redirected the page, the page still look like this one, as if it hadn't been changed at all. When I clicked "edit", and then "preview", this page appeared, but this didn't correspond to the theory page. After I capitalized the redirect commands, the page redirected correctly.--Ice Vision 18:07, 25 November 2007 (EST)
  • Wow, I've never heard of that happening with lowercase redirect commands. How did you access the page the first time? Did you go through the diff page from the recent changes, or did you go through the history, or did you just click the page, etc.? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:11, 25 November 2007 (EST)
    • I clicked a link to the page on the recent changes. It's really confusing.--Ice Vision 18:18, 25 November 2007 (EST)
      • That's odd. I've never heard of that happening. When you click the diff link, it should take you to a page that says something like "1. redirect Theory:Adam Monroe". At the top, the left side would have the old information (the afd page) and the right would have the new information (the redirect code). Let me know if it happens again. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2007 (EST)
        • Okay, I'll let you know.--Ice Vision 22:00, 25 November 2007 (EST)

Your theory on Arthur Petrelli

"It should be noted that Arthur was a soldier who fought in the Vietnam War, which obviously makes [sic] a murderer."

Please keep comments like this out of the theories sections from now on. Hiding the additions behind grammar improvments doesnt make them untrackable.--Piemanmoo 03:06, 1 December 2007 (EST)

• I didn't mean to "hide" that comment. It was a rather insignificant note, so I didn't think anyone would mind. Really, Arthur was a veteran, so he has killed people before. I don't see what the big deal is.--Ice Vision 11:22, 1 December 2007 (EST)
  • The big deal is drawing the connection between being a murderer and being a veteran. I'm not going into military law but killing someone on a mission is not murder if it's your mission, such as the case for Au Co.--Bob (talk) 11:32, 1 December 2007 (EST)
    • I understand that, but what I was trying to say is that Arthur has experienced what it was like to kill someone (even though it may have been his mission), and he seemed to tastelessly take a girl's life. You've explained it to me a lot better, so I understand. You can go ahead and remove the note right now if you want.--Ice Vision 11:40, 1 December 2007 (EST)
      • I think the way it's reworded, it's sufficient and unoffensive as a note.--Bob (talk) 11:42, 1 December 2007 (EST)

Nosebleeds

Thanks for uploading those images! -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 18:35, 10 December 2007 (EST)

• No problem. --Ice Vision 18:38, 10 December 2007 (EST)