This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Help talk:Theories: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>E rowe New page: ==Format== Some people are including a title for their theory in addition to a simple description. This does not fit the usual format. Should we remove the titles and put a rule in the for... |
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Format== |
==Format== |
||
Some people are including a title for their theory in addition to a simple description. This does not fit the usual format. Should we remove the titles and put a rule in the format description that tells what exactly belongs in the theory box?--[[User:E rowe|E rowe]] 18:41, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
Some people are including a title for their theory in addition to a simple description. This does not fit the usual format. Should we remove the titles and put a rule in the format description that tells what exactly belongs in the theory box?--[[User:E rowe|E rowe]] 18:41, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
||
* I'm not a big fan of the titles. In fact, in most cases, I think the title should ''be'' the description of the theory, and the rest of the explanation should be in Notes. That would be more standard. The first two columns should really be very brief: a statement of the theory, and any canon evidence with a citation. The rest--all the reasoning, explanation, hypothesizing, and such--really belongs in Notes.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:54, 8 March 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 23:54, 8 March 2007
Format
Some people are including a title for their theory in addition to a simple description. This does not fit the usual format. Should we remove the titles and put a rule in the format description that tells what exactly belongs in the theory box?--E rowe 18:41, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- I'm not a big fan of the titles. In fact, in most cases, I think the title should be the description of the theory, and the rest of the explanation should be in Notes. That would be more standard. The first two columns should really be very brief: a statement of the theory, and any canon evidence with a citation. The rest--all the reasoning, explanation, hypothesizing, and such--really belongs in Notes.--Hardvice (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2007 (EST)