This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Category talk:Characters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Hardvice →Thousand dollar question re: the new cat: -cat (duh) |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Thousand dollar question re: the new cat== |
==Thousand dollar question re: the new cat== |
||
Standard wiki practice (read: standard Wikipedia practice) is to have articles which are part of a subcat not listed as part of the parent cat. I've always liked having Category:People be a list of all people, whether evolved or not, but it's entirely up for discussion whether we should just go through and remove Category:People from the articles (making it a true parent category) or replace it with Category:Characters (preserving the combined list). It's about the same amount of work either way. Thoughts? --[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 22:12, 20 December 2006 (EST) |
Standard wiki practice (read: standard Wikipedia practice) is to have articles which are part of a subcat not listed as part of the parent cat. I've always liked having Category:People be a list of all people, whether evolved or not, but it's entirely up for discussion whether we should just go through and remove Category:People from the articles (making it a true parent category) or replace it with Category:Characters (preserving the combined list). It's about the same amount of work either way. Thoughts? --[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 22:12, 20 December 2006 (EST) |
||
:I agree. I think the standard practice works for most cases, but not this one. If I want to see the characters, I want to see ''all'' characters, not just the evolved ones (in fact, most people would probably want to ''primarily'' see the evolved ones). For instance, since Peter is both evolved and a character, he should be in both categories. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 22:56, 20 December 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 03:56, 21 December 2006
Thousand dollar question re: the new cat
Standard wiki practice (read: standard Wikipedia practice) is to have articles which are part of a subcat not listed as part of the parent cat. I've always liked having Category:People be a list of all people, whether evolved or not, but it's entirely up for discussion whether we should just go through and remove Category:People from the articles (making it a true parent category) or replace it with Category:Characters (preserving the combined list). It's about the same amount of work either way. Thoughts? --Hardvice (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2006 (EST)
- I agree. I think the standard practice works for most cases, but not this one. If I want to see the characters, I want to see all characters, not just the evolved ones (in fact, most people would probably want to primarily see the evolved ones). For instance, since Peter is both evolved and a character, he should be in both categories. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:56, 20 December 2006 (EST)