This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:April: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
imported>Kedarus The Group of Twelve -> The Group of twelve |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** I guess I define canon differently from you. I would think that anything that Tim Kring said about characters or the show would make it canon. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 14:44, 3 October 2007 (EDT) |
** I guess I define canon differently from you. I would think that anything that Tim Kring said about characters or the show would make it canon. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 14:44, 3 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
*** Please see [[Help:Sources]] for an explanation of what information should be used in which sections of articles.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:09, 3 October 2007 (EDT) |
*** Please see [[Help:Sources]] for an explanation of what information should be used in which sections of articles.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:09, 3 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
* If [[The Group of |
* If [[The Group of twelve]] can include [[Bob]] as stated in the infobox, I see no issue that April's sexuality could not be also mentioned. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 13:27, 4 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
** Bob's membership in that group is indicated only in the notes, not in the introductory paragraph. April should be treated similarly. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:36, 4 October 2007 (EDT) |
** Bob's membership in that group is indicated only in the notes, not in the introductory paragraph. April should be treated similarly. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 13:36, 4 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
** Bob has been removed from the infobox. He should not have been listed there yet. Two wrongs don't make a right.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 14:50, 4 October 2007 (EDT) |
** Bob has been removed from the infobox. He should not have been listed there yet. Two wrongs don't make a right.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 14:50, 4 October 2007 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 09:10, 31 October 2007
Sexuality
I tried finding a link to reference that April is a lesbian, but couldn't find anything that was from the writers of the show. There are a number of bloggers out there that talk about it, but I didn't want to use that as a reference. If anyone could find one, please put it up there. Thanks. --Pinkkeith 14:17, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
- I don't think we have anything official about this character since her story was cut before the show started airing. I think her sexuality should probably be mentioned in Notes, not in the main article space, since there's no canon confirmation of it.--Hardvice (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
- I guess I define canon differently from you. I would think that anything that Tim Kring said about characters or the show would make it canon. --Pinkkeith 14:44, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
- Please see Help:Sources for an explanation of what information should be used in which sections of articles.--Hardvice (talk) 15:09, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
- I guess I define canon differently from you. I would think that anything that Tim Kring said about characters or the show would make it canon. --Pinkkeith 14:44, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
- If The Group of twelve can include Bob as stated in the infobox, I see no issue that April's sexuality could not be also mentioned. --Pinkkeith 13:27, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
- Bob's membership in that group is indicated only in the notes, not in the introductory paragraph. April should be treated similarly. --Ted C 13:36, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
- Bob has been removed from the infobox. He should not have been listed there yet. Two wrongs don't make a right.--Hardvice (talk) 14:50, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
- I don't see anything "wrong" with either way, I just want to see some consistency with our definitions. --Pinkkeith 15:01, 4 October 2007 (EDT)