This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Melting: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Admin |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
***** See, that's where I was leaning!--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 01:03, 13 February 2007 (EST) |
***** See, that's where I was leaning!--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 01:03, 13 February 2007 (EST) |
||
****** So was I. Based on what we saw it looked like he was breaking down the molecular bonds and the object was essentially falling apart at the molecular level. Though I like how liquification is vague enough where we're not speculating on the exact mechanism. Let's go, Mohinder, it's time to get to work making files for these powers (and showing them to us!) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 01:22, 13 February 2007 (EST)) |
****** So was I. Based on what we saw it looked like he was breaking down the molecular bonds and the object was essentially falling apart at the molecular level. Though I like how liquification is vague enough where we're not speculating on the exact mechanism. Let's go, Mohinder, it's time to get to work making files for these powers (and showing them to us!) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 01:22, 13 February 2007 (EST)) |
||
*******Oh. I was thinking of, um, "melting". :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:29, 13 February 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 06:29, 13 February 2007
Touch?
Sylar didn't have to touch it to affect it. His hand was hovering over it. Anomy 22:32, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- I thought he actually touched it. We'll get a few more opinions and modify the page if needed. --Ted C 22:34, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- Okay... I might of missed it. I'm not sure. Anyone know where I can get a torrent of it? Anomy
- I also thought he did not quite touch it. He did get pretty close. I wouldn't so flatly assert that the power only works when touching something. I would say something more like, "It is unknown what the range of this power is, but it appears to be something less than one foot."--E rowe 22:51, 12 February 2007 (EST)
Name
So it's "liquefaction" now? I think "liquification" is much better. More accessible, and just as descriptive. I vote to change it back. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:51, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- Agreed. Liquefaction, while technically just as correct, sounds antiquated and looks...I don't know, wrong? --ZyberGoat 23:54, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- I'm not super-pleased with either, to be honest, but until we know more about how it works, I guess either is fine. "Liquefaction" is technically the correct word, since "liquification" is a relative newcomer mostly limited to industrial uses. Bleh. I just can't make myself care. I'm distracted by the three new Star Trek references and the lack of Tawny.--Hardvice (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2007 (EST)
- Man, you really like Tawny, don't you! I don't think we're going to see too much more of the power, but yeah, let's wait to change it. (I still hate it, for the record). — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- I thought for sure I was going to get here tonight and find an article called "molecular destabilization". --Fcphantom 00:55, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- See, that's where I was leaning!--Hardvice (talk) 01:03, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- So was I. Based on what we saw it looked like he was breaking down the molecular bonds and the object was essentially falling apart at the molecular level. Though I like how liquification is vague enough where we're not speculating on the exact mechanism. Let's go, Mohinder, it's time to get to work making files for these powers (and showing them to us!) (Admin 01:22, 13 February 2007 (EST))
- Oh. I was thinking of, um, "melting". :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:29, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- So was I. Based on what we saw it looked like he was breaking down the molecular bonds and the object was essentially falling apart at the molecular level. Though I like how liquification is vague enough where we're not speculating on the exact mechanism. Let's go, Mohinder, it's time to get to work making files for these powers (and showing them to us!) (Admin 01:22, 13 February 2007 (EST))
- See, that's where I was leaning!--Hardvice (talk) 01:03, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- I thought for sure I was going to get here tonight and find an article called "molecular destabilization". --Fcphantom 00:55, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- Man, you really like Tawny, don't you! I don't think we're going to see too much more of the power, but yeah, let's wait to change it. (I still hate it, for the record). — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2007 (EST)
- I'm not super-pleased with either, to be honest, but until we know more about how it works, I guess either is fine. "Liquefaction" is technically the correct word, since "liquification" is a relative newcomer mostly limited to industrial uses. Bleh. I just can't make myself care. I'm distracted by the three new Star Trek references and the lack of Tawny.--Hardvice (talk) 23:56, 12 February 2007 (EST)