This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Moral ambiguity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart No edit summary |
imported>Baldbobbo Sylar attacks |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
**** Good list, by the way - this will help with linking to the page. Thanks! - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 15:33, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
**** Good list, by the way - this will help with linking to the page. Thanks! - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 15:33, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
||
Sounds good. Change its name before we get too far into then, please. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 02:52, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
Sounds good. Change its name before we get too far into then, please. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 02:52, 4 January 2007 (EST) |
||
== Sylar attacks == |
|||
So I think that the continuation of Sylar's attacks should not be included on this page. Moral ambiguity suggests that the line is blurred. I think the first instance of his attacks should note his motives, but subsequent attacks are derived from that one motive. Just my thoughts.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 05:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 09:40, 3 April 2007
- I find there's actually shockingly little "good" versus "evil" in the show, in at least that none of the characters are really "good" or "evil" (with the possible exception of Sylar and Jessica, but even that's debatable). I'd say that "moral ambiguity" is a much more prevalent theme.--Hardvice (talk) 02:46, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- Totally agree - it's actually surprising how few clearly "good" or "bad" characters there are. Good catch. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 06:47, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- The more I think about it ... even Matt, my first pick for a totally "good" character, seems to have few qualms about invading people's privacy by reading their minds. Granted, most of the time he does it, it's for good ends, but at the bar he seemed to be doing it for kicks. Jessica is motivated by fear and a desire to protect/provide. Sylar feels he's compelled to finish the job evolution started. Claire intentionally maimed Brody. Micah lies to DL and tells Jessica, who he knows is up to no good, how to find them. Peter worries he might be the villain after all. Nathan and Mr. Bennet are all over the place.--Hardvice (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- Good list, by the way - this will help with linking to the page. Thanks! - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- The more I think about it ... even Matt, my first pick for a totally "good" character, seems to have few qualms about invading people's privacy by reading their minds. Granted, most of the time he does it, it's for good ends, but at the bar he seemed to be doing it for kicks. Jessica is motivated by fear and a desire to protect/provide. Sylar feels he's compelled to finish the job evolution started. Claire intentionally maimed Brody. Micah lies to DL and tells Jessica, who he knows is up to no good, how to find them. Peter worries he might be the villain after all. Nathan and Mr. Bennet are all over the place.--Hardvice (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2007 (EST)
- Totally agree - it's actually surprising how few clearly "good" or "bad" characters there are. Good catch. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 06:47, 4 January 2007 (EST)
Sounds good. Change its name before we get too far into then, please. ---- 
02:52, 4 January 2007 (EST)
Sylar attacks
So I think that the continuation of Sylar's attacks should not be included on this page. Moral ambiguity suggests that the line is blurred. I think the first instance of his attacks should note his motives, but subsequent attacks are derived from that one motive. Just my thoughts.--Bob 05:40, 3 April 2007 (EDT)