Talk:Nathan Petrelli (exposed future)

Dead?

Do we know for sure that he is dead? Remember Sylar started cutting Elle's skull and she survived. Granted Peter cut him more than Sylar did Elle we don't know for sure if he is dead. Especially since Claire is in the other room and can heal him with her blood. I think we should put unknown, because the cutting of the skull doesn't hit the brain, as we saw when Sylar attacked Claire.--BlueRavenBoy 19:03, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

He lost a lot of blood...and even if she did heal him with her blood he would have still died...again... - Cael 19:28, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

I don't understand what you are trying to say, if Claire healed him before her died, or even after he died. Why would he of died again? Because of the world blowing up? With that logic all of the future characters should be dead.--BlueRavenBoy 20:18, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Change Exposed, to Villains

Isn't this Nathan from Villain's future? Because when Future Peter brought Peter to the future it was after Nathan was shot therefore there was no exposed future at the time. --BlueRavenBoy 19:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

• As of now, "exposed future" refers to both Future Peter's and the new timeline, and "Villains future" refers to the timeline where Tokyo blows up. - Josh (talk/contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2008 (EDT)