Talk:Related Articles:Sylar: Difference between revisions
imported>Ohmyn0 No edit summary |
imported>FrenchFlo No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== For the Elements Section == |
== For the Elements Section == |
||
| Line 8: | Line 7: | ||
==Eek== |
==Eek== |
||
Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT) |
Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
==See Also== |
|||
The See Also section appears to be broken, it's missplaced on the page. --[[User:FrenchFlo|<span style="color:black; font-weight:bold;">FrenchFlo</span>]][[User talk:FrenchFlo|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FrenchFlo|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(contribs)</span>]] 18:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:32, 26 March 2007
For the Elements Section
If a template exists, should we just put that in there instead?
Template:Sylar would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes. Nevermind, it would link back to itself. --Bob 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
Eek
Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--Hardvice (talk) 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)
See Also
The See Also section appears to be broken, it's missplaced on the page. --FrenchFlo(talk)(contribs) 18:32, 26 March 2007 (EDT)