Talk:Ted's email: Difference between revisions
imported>Ryangibsonstewart No edit summary |
imported>WolvenSpectre No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::I have no problem with leaving it "The email" until we have a better idea where it belongs. I don't think we need to feel compelled to pigeonhole it (badly) into the same scheme as the other articles. I'd rather we stick with what we know for sure and cross any bridges when we come to them.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:45, 17 January 2007 (EST) |
:::I have no problem with leaving it "The email" until we have a better idea where it belongs. I don't think we need to feel compelled to pigeonhole it (badly) into the same scheme as the other articles. I'd rather we stick with what we know for sure and cross any bridges when we come to them.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:45, 17 January 2007 (EST) |
||
:::: Ah, good point. Thank you, voice of reason. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 21:53, 17 January 2007 (EST) |
:::: Ah, good point. Thank you, voice of reason. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 21:53, 17 January 2007 (EST) |
||
===Capitolizing "email"=== |
|||
Does anybody have problems with me capitalizing the E so the title matches allthe other theory titles. (and lets notstart up the whole what is correct form of "email" again, please).--[[User:WolvenSpectre|WolvenSpectre]] 11:15, 27 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 16:15, 27 January 2007
Article Name
For consistency, should this page be renamed? We've been including the possessor/originator in the title (Claire's tape, Sylar's message), but that doesn't really work in this case. Hana's email is misleading, since she didn't write it and it wasn't sent to her. We don't know the originator or recipient, so that won't work. And "TEDDYBEAR616's email" just doesn't work for me. Other choices include "Montana email", "Encrypted email", "Leet email", "1337 email", "Intercepted email", and "Email about Mr. Bennet". Nothing too great. Any suggestions/comments? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:38, 17 January 2007 (EST)
- Well, "intercepted mail" might work out, but i guess we will have a whole bunch of them. "Montana email" or "Teddy's email" are probably better, but they both sound kinda funny. -- Cuardin 15:41, 17 January 2007 (EST)
- I have no problem with leaving it "The email" until we have a better idea where it belongs. I don't think we need to feel compelled to pigeonhole it (badly) into the same scheme as the other articles. I'd rather we stick with what we know for sure and cross any bridges when we come to them.--Hardvice (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2007 (EST)
- Ah, good point. Thank you, voice of reason. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2007 (EST)
- I have no problem with leaving it "The email" until we have a better idea where it belongs. I don't think we need to feel compelled to pigeonhole it (badly) into the same scheme as the other articles. I'd rather we stick with what we know for sure and cross any bridges when we come to them.--Hardvice (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2007 (EST)
- Well, "intercepted mail" might work out, but i guess we will have a whole bunch of them. "Montana email" or "Teddy's email" are probably better, but they both sound kinda funny. -- Cuardin 15:41, 17 January 2007 (EST)
Capitolizing "email"
Does anybody have problems with me capitalizing the E so the title matches allthe other theory titles. (and lets notstart up the whole what is correct form of "email" again, please).--WolvenSpectre 11:15, 27 January 2007 (EST)