Talk:Theories:People

Repositioned Claude Rains Theories

I just went and reinvented the wheel and thought that there was no Claude Rains stuff on this page in spite of me remembering seeing some before the reformat. I entered an new theory about his name and built a new table in the Alphabetically correct spot for Claude, but noticed most stuff goes by last name even though it is not formatted by surname. Of course I don't notice it until I shift all the old stuff to the new location. I should have done it the other way around and I am having problems putting it back. Can someone try. Thanks. --WolvenSpectre 17:54, 5 February 2007 (EST)

• Taken care of. I also tricked the sections to display surname first, which should help prevent further confusion (though they're trickier to maintain ... hmmm, I need to add something to the help page about how to do it...)--Hardvice (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2007 (EST)
  • also could you also 'watch' all the Theory Pages that were made in the redesign for those of us users who were watching the Leviathan That was the old page? I don't know but I assume it would be easier for all you admins than each person rewatching the pages.--WolvenSpectre 18:26, 5 February 2007 (EST)
    • I don't really watch anything but my talk page and community pages, but I do patrol Recent Changes, as do a few of the other admins.--Hardvice (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2007 (EST)
      • sorry poor choice of words... I meant that everyone that had the original Theories Page on their watchlist for notifications. Could you put the new multiple theories pages on those users watchlists? At least easier than if they did it manually because if I wasn't looking for a particular reference in the theories pages, I wouldn't have known that the pages were redesigned and I wasn't getting notices. Then again I have been having trouble s with some of them anyway, but they seem to be getting fewer and farther between.--WolvenSpectre 18:42, 5 February 2007 (EST)
        • I don't think there's a way to make somebody watch a page (but it wouldn't hurt to ask Admin). That said, everybody who was watching Theories (hopefully) got an email when the page was changed (although since the emails are limited to one between visits, it's possible some folks missed it.)--Hardvice (talk) 18:50, 5 February 2007 (EST)
          • Odd... I didn't recieve mine. Then again like I have said before I don't log out.--WolvenSpectre 18:56, 5 February 2007 (EST)

Mr Nakamura Star Trek Theory

Hardvice deserves five stars for this one!--WolvenSpectre 02:28, 13 February 2007 (EST)

• I didn't add it. JD did.--Hardvice (talk) 03:07, 13 February 2007 (EST)
  • Sorry, whoever added it, I guess the changes when I used the link in the email didn't match the name of the actual poster again. It showed Hardvice as the author of the change (nothing before, no intermediate steps, and the full unaltered post afterward). I'll have to look it up in my email.--WolvenSpectre 03:59, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Not of quality

Might I ask why it's not up to standards? Heroe 17:41, 19 February 2007 (EST)

• Just noting that it hasn't been cleaned up like the others yet. Non-canon evidence needs to be moved to Notes, links need to be added, spelling and grammar need to be tweaked, etc. All of the other theories articles have been done already and I don't want us to forget to do this one, too.--Hardvice (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2007 (EST)
  • Plus, it's a good way to CYA -- if somebody comes to the site, this page might be their first impression. It's a good disclaimer. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2007 (EST)

Claude is the Doctor

I've moved this into Disproven Theories. If Claude was a Time Lord he would looked cooler than Peter on the Heat Vistion googles. Yamiangie 16:49, 22 February 2007

• I have to say, that is one of the most creative reasons for a theory to be disproven. Nice! :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2007 (EST)

Split

I suggest we split this theories page (which is getting loooong, and will only grow longer). It would make sense to split it into humans and evolved humans. It would also split it pretty evenly: right now, there are 16 EHs and 16 humans. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2007 (EST)