Heroes Wiki:Community Portal: Difference between revisions
imported>Admin added link to localization effort |
imported>Admin →Soandso is Sylar: removed secion... no longer relevant |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
As a reader of Lostpedia, I noticed that they've recently rolled out a new feature: theory tabs at the top of pages. Considering Heroes is still at a relatively young point and theories aren't quite as numerous, rampant, and developed as in Lost, I think that as time progresses, it could be a good idea. It could definitely help keep the pages less cluttered. Please discuss any thoughts on this article's discussion page. |
As a reader of Lostpedia, I noticed that they've recently rolled out a new feature: theory tabs at the top of pages. Considering Heroes is still at a relatively young point and theories aren't quite as numerous, rampant, and developed as in Lost, I think that as time progresses, it could be a good idea. It could definitely help keep the pages less cluttered. Please discuss any thoughts on this article's discussion page. |
||
==Soandso is Sylar== |
|||
* How do people feel about gettind rid of all the "Soandso is Sylar" theories? By this point I think it should be clear that Sylar is his own character. I'm in favor of purging disproven fan theories rather than leaving them with "proven" notes on them since a lot of fan theories are, in my opinion, barely even worth including. Minor speculation seems ok when they imply things, but some of these fan theories are real stretches. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 01:04, 21 November 2006 (EST)) |
|||
* I'd even be favor of eliminating "Fan Theories" sections from every article and instead just creating a single article labeled "Fan Theories". To me the fan theories actually decrease the quality of our articles by introducing extreme speculation. We could have a single Fan Theories article with a label at the top indicating that it's not information that's been substantiated. Other opinions on this? ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 15:37, 21 November 2006 (EST)) |
|||
** I feel we have a bunch of options here. |
|||
# We could create a shadow document for every article, similar to Lostepedia ("Community Portal/Theories) and put a reference as a tab at the top of the page. I think that was mentioned before, and it requires coding to alter the wiki JavaScript, but once you do that, it is trivial to navigate to the theory page |
|||
# We already have pages like this with Spoilers: appended to the front ("Spoilers:Zach"), so we could use that naming convention for the shadow documents, move information out of the primary document into the shadow document, and then manually reference between the two, like we do with the upcoming episode spoilers. |
|||
# Create a giant fan theories document, with separate sections for each article. In the parent article, just reference the fan theories sub-section with the #Reference. |
|||
Option 3 requires the least amount of new pages, but may get unwieldly long... but it makes it easy to purge old disproven theories. I think any of the three methods could be implemented with templates if the articles match up right... --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 16:01, 21 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
* Ok, I gave it a shot with the [[Sylar]] page. I created the [[Theories]] page, and created a template that jumps to the matching section.... so, from now on, all you have to do is include a <nowiki>{{Theories}}</nowiki> into any page and it will auto-create a section that links to the Fan Theories page. This should make it really easy to combine everything together. --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 16:19, 21 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
* For what it's worth, I just found this wiki today and loved the all-encompassing theories page, especially the fact that you've kept the old theories around but just struck them through. Helps to be able to see past ideas that have been discounted (which keeps them from popping up again). I'd say leave as one page until it becomes unruly, at which point you'd maybe have found a logical way to split it up. [[User:Dschuetz|Dschuetz]] 08:25, 30 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
** Agreed. The theories page makes the whole site so clean. Plus I can ignore the drivel I want... I do think that pretty soon, some of the disproven theories should be removed, or placed in an archive. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 20:53, 30 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
==Heroes Wiki mentioned on "The 9th" heroescast== |
==Heroes Wiki mentioned on "The 9th" heroescast== |
||
Revision as of 03:50, 22 December 2006
Languages
- Heroes Wiki is always looking for people interested in translating this wiki into other languages. If you are interested, check out this article. Please keep in mind that translating the wiki and maintaining the translation is a lot of work, so we encourage you to gather a group of people who are interested in helping.
Regarding Browsing and Formatting.
When writing or adding to an article, and inter-linking it, please be wary of using standard formatting. Information about standard elements and formatting is available here, and general Wiki formatting information is available here.
Also, be sure to avoid creating duplicate articles. Search around to find if related articles already exist and redirect to them as appropriate. It's one of the great things about wikis.
- (You can also link through non-direct links, see WikiText for more info.)
Theories
As a reader of Lostpedia, I noticed that they've recently rolled out a new feature: theory tabs at the top of pages. Considering Heroes is still at a relatively young point and theories aren't quite as numerous, rampant, and developed as in Lost, I think that as time progresses, it could be a good idea. It could definitely help keep the pages less cluttered. Please discuss any thoughts on this article's discussion page.
Heroes Wiki mentioned on "The 9th" heroescast
- Heroes Wiki was "pimped" on their December 11th Heroescast. Check out their site to listen to it. They had many kind words for us, thanks! ...and to the cast of The 9th... as for being listed on our site, you're already on our Fan Sites page!
"The 10th Wonder" podcast discusses Heroes Wiki
- Heroes Wiki was mentioned in their December 12th podcast as one of the Heroes fansites that are "doing a great job for the Heroes fan community." We appreciate the compliments, guys, and are glad you and your fans are enjoying the site! You can listen to the podcast on their site.