This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Template talk:News: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart →What goes here?: sp |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
but is it relevant? is it too spoilerish? Important enough? Maybe the criteria for `news' should be clearer... [[User:Rwun|Rwun]] 00:16, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
but is it relevant? is it too spoilerish? Important enough? Maybe the criteria for `news' should be clearer... [[User:Rwun|Rwun]] 00:16, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
||
* That looks like more of an [[Interviews|interview]]. That's about the only distinction I make: interviews with cast and crew go on interviews, articles about the show go on News.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:21, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
* That looks like more of an [[Interviews|interview]]. That's about the only distinction I make: interviews with cast and crew go on interviews, articles about the show go on News.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:21, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
||
*In general, I wouldn't worry about whether or not there are spoilers in an article. We have to assume that if somebody's going to read an article off this site, they read at their own risk. To me, the fact that |
*In general, I wouldn't worry about whether or not there are spoilers in an article. We have to assume that if somebody's going to read an article off this site, they read at their own risk. To me, the fact that it's off site is its own spoiler warning. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 05:20, 24 April 2007
Oh, what a knock-off. NBC set up their own wiki. Looks like someone feels theatened. :P -- Cuardin 13:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- And on the subject, I can't seem to create an account there. If I click the Log In/Create AccountI come to the login page, but I can't seem to create an account. -- Cuardin 13:46, 22 January 2007 (EST)
Not News
Although the info about Heroes 360 ("HEROES 360 includes new HEROES Wiki, Suresh Map and the primatechpaper.com website") is good and should be included somewhere on the wiki, I'm not sure that "News" is the best place for it. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:33, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- I just removed it even before seeing your posting here for that reason. :) The news template is for external links to Heroes news articles on other sites. Both links are mentioned elsewhere on the wiki already so we're good. (Admin 14:37, 22 January 2007 (EST))
- Fantastic. GMTA. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- What does the Greater Metropolitan Transit Authority have to do with anything? ;) --Hardvice (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- It's not made of waffles, I'll tell you that. ... Great Minds Think Alike. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:10, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- What does the Greater Metropolitan Transit Authority have to do with anything? ;) --Hardvice (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2007 (EST)
- Fantastic. GMTA. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2007 (EST)
What goes here?
What should/shouldn't go here? There's a great article at http://www.wired.com/entertainment/hollywood/news/2007/04/magkring but is it relevant? is it too spoilerish? Important enough? Maybe the criteria for `news' should be clearer... Rwun 00:16, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- That looks like more of an interview. That's about the only distinction I make: interviews with cast and crew go on interviews, articles about the show go on News.--Hardvice (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2007 (EDT)
- In general, I wouldn't worry about whether or not there are spoilers in an article. We have to assume that if somebody's going to read an article off this site, they read at their own risk. To me, the fact that it's off site is its own spoiler warning. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2007 (EDT)