This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Template talk:Primatech Research: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Pierre
No edit summary
imported>Ryangibsonstewart
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
*I have to disagree. I think this template links together all of the articles related to [[Primatech Research]] which is what navigation templates should be doing. If there was only one other article I would agree with you. As for not following a standarad, I don't see that we have a [[Help:Templates|standarad with templates]] as far as layout is concerned. I don't have a problem with this template. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 16:15, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
*I have to disagree. I think this template links together all of the articles related to [[Primatech Research]] which is what navigation templates should be doing. If there was only one other article I would agree with you. As for not following a standarad, I don't see that we have a [[Help:Templates|standarad with templates]] as far as layout is concerned. I don't have a problem with this template. --[[User:Pinkkeith|Pinkkeith]] 16:15, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
**I kinda like it, and it *does* have a nice purpose. And as long as [[Template:Sylar]] and [[Template:Linderman]], both of which also doesn't mach Heroes Wiki's standards for navbars, exist, I don't see why this one can't... [[User:Pierre|Pierre]] 16:25, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
**I kinda like it, and it *does* have a nice purpose. And as long as [[Template:Sylar]] and [[Template:Linderman]], both of which also doesn't mach Heroes Wiki's standards for navbars, exist, I don't see why this one can't... [[User:Pierre|Pierre]] 16:25, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
*** It assumes that Level 1 is [[Primatech Research]] and vice versa. Does the level refer to the story the cells are on, or does it refer to the level of security employed in the cells? Ultimately, we have learned of exactly two levels: 2 and 5. That's really all that should be on here. Perhaps those are the only ones that exist. As for matching Heroes Wiki's standards, navbars should be horizontal, not vertical. It's also unnecessarily wide and does not have the correct bottom. But those issues are easily fixed. I take issue more with the purpose of a navbar which really only links two articles together. I'd rather see the two levels to the [[Template:Education|education and research places navbar]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:00, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:00, 9 October 2008

This template is unnecessary and it doesn't match Heroes Wiki's standards for navbars. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:45, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

  • I have to disagree. I think this template links together all of the articles related to Primatech Research which is what navigation templates should be doing. If there was only one other article I would agree with you. As for not following a standarad, I don't see that we have a standarad with templates as far as layout is concerned. I don't have a problem with this template. --Pinkkeith 16:15, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
    • I kinda like it, and it *does* have a nice purpose. And as long as Template:Sylar and Template:Linderman, both of which also doesn't mach Heroes Wiki's standards for navbars, exist, I don't see why this one can't... Pierre 16:25, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
      • It assumes that Level 1 is Primatech Research and vice versa. Does the level refer to the story the cells are on, or does it refer to the level of security employed in the cells? Ultimately, we have learned of exactly two levels: 2 and 5. That's really all that should be on here. Perhaps those are the only ones that exist. As for matching Heroes Wiki's standards, navbars should be horizontal, not vertical. It's also unnecessarily wide and does not have the correct bottom. But those issues are easily fixed. I take issue more with the purpose of a navbar which really only links two articles together. I'd rather see the two levels to the education and research places navbar. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2008 (EDT)