This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Template talk:Timelinearticle: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ohmyn0 mNo edit summary |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Should we worry about getting the timeline itself up to par before approaching this? |
* Should we worry about getting the timeline itself up to par before approaching this? |
||
See an example at [[Homecoming (event)]] before you vote to '''''Use it''''' or '''''Lose it'''''. --''''' [[User:Ohmyn0|<span style="color:#000000">Ohmyn0</span>]][[User talk:Ohmyn0|<span style="color:#808080">(talk)</span>]]''''' 15:26, 31 March 2007 (EDT) |
See an example at [[Homecoming (event)]] before you vote to '''''Use it''''' or '''''Lose it'''''. --''''' [[User:Ohmyn0|<span style="color:#000000">Ohmyn0</span>]][[User talk:Ohmyn0|<span style="color:#808080">(talk)</span>]]''''' 15:26, 31 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
**I think it looks nice. I actually think it would be easier to include span ids on the timeline. It needs to be done anyway, so why not just include a span id for the article name? Plus, if an event doesn't quite fit under one date, it'll still just link to the [[timeline]], which is absolutely fine. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 19:53, 31 March 2007
Use it or Lose it?
I made this template, but before I slap it on a dozen of articles, I'd like some thoughts on it. I have some suggestions and questions:
- Should we make a field to enter in the date? the #{{PAGENAME}} pipe doesn't work.
- Should we worry about getting the timeline itself up to par before approaching this?
See an example at Homecoming (event) before you vote to Use it or Lose it. -- Ohmyn0(talk) 15:26, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
- I think it looks nice. I actually think it would be easier to include span ids on the timeline. It needs to be done anyway, so why not just include a span id for the article name? Plus, if an event doesn't quite fit under one date, it'll still just link to the timeline, which is absolutely fine. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)