Episode talk:Nothing to Hide

New episode checklist:

• Episode article (monologue, summary, synopsis, quotes, trivia)
• Episode redirect
• Check links from previous episode
• Episode screencap
• Update Main Page (AOTW, Next on Heroes, Index)
• Update Main Character pages (Peter, Nathan, Isaac, Claire, Matt, Niki, Jessica, DL, Mohinder, Micah, Mr Bennet, Sylar)
• Update Other Character pages as needed (Eden, Audrey, Ando, Simone, Chandra, Zach, Tina, Mysterious Man, Janice Parkman, etc.) Heidi, Angela, Lyle
• Add new character pages as needed: Theodore Sprague, Karen Sprague, Robert Fresca, Oliver Dennison, Matt's partner
• Update plot points (The Symbol, The Tape, The Map, Patient Zero, The Key, The Algorithm, Isaac's paintings, etc.) and add new ones as needed: the missing painting, the mark (on Matt and Theodore's necks)

My stupid DVR cut off the final section of the voiceover at the end of the episode. Someone else will have to finish it. - fcphantom

All taken care of. Thanks for the start. :) (Admin 00:34, 7 November 2006 (EST))

Teamwork

• I just wanted to say how impressed I was at how so many people came together tonight to transform this article from basically nothing to what it is now. The speed at which we add new information following an episode is amazing. :) (Admin 01:17, 7 November 2006 (EST))

Doctor and Reporter

• Could someone confirm I got the names of the deceased doctor (Robert Fresca) and the reporter (Oliver Dennison) correct before we setup articles for them? That's what their names sounded like to me, but I didn't check the credits for the reporter and haven't seen the doctor's name in writing yet. (Admin 02:57, 7 November 2006 (EST))
  • Matt's partner is Tom McHenry, per the new graphic novel. The reporter is definitely Oliver Dennison. The oncologist is a bit tricky: when Audrey says it, it definitely sounds like "Robert Fresco", but when Ted says it its sounds more like "Robert Fresca".--Hardvice (talk) 05:42, 7 November 2006 (EST)

Nathan's conversation with Mr. Linderman

• In the article for this episode it states:

Nathan speaks on the phone to Mr. Linderman regarding the painting Peter was asking about. He tells Mr. Linderman not to let Peter get the painting.

• Here's a transcript of what Nathan says on the phone:

Yes Mr. Linderman. It seems my brother has developed some sort of emotional attachment to this painting. I don't know what will happen to him if he doesn't get it but I'd rather not find out. Directly to the gallery. Mr. Linderman, I...I appreciate it. Good night.

• My interpretation of this is that he is trying to get Peter the painting, not trying to stop him from getting it. I guess it's how you interpret the triple negative (don't know/doesn't get/rather not). I'm not sure how you guys feel. Dadadave 20:53, 7 November 2006 (EST)

• What I heard was "I dont know what will happen to him if he does get it, but I'd rather not find out." implying that Nathan is convincing Mr. Linderman to keep it away from Peter. I'll give it another listen, though. (Admin 20:57, 7 November 2006 (EST))

• I listened to it a few more times and it is sort of unclear what he says. I'm still leaning towards "doesn't". I wonder what other people hear. Maybe the muffled the sound on purpose so we are supposed to be confused? If you go by my interpretation, the subsequent plot is confusing. First Nathan says "I appreciate it" as if Mr. Linderman will help Nathan. But then when Nathan goes over to Peter's place he tells Peter that Mr. Linderman is "not going to let it go". I think Admin's interpretation makes more sense plotwise but again, that's not I'm hearing him say on the phone so I'm confused.Dadadave 21:09, 7 November 2006 (EST)