This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Fan Creation talk:Glossary: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Admin comment |
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*It's definitely a good idea (although we do tend to avoid these acronyms in articles, with the exception of AWI, it's still a pretty important reference). Nice job! Any idea "BWM" stands for?--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 11:09, 29 January 2007 (EST) |
*It's definitely a good idea (although we do tend to avoid these acronyms in articles, with the exception of AWI, it's still a pretty important reference). Nice job! Any idea "BWM" stands for?--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 11:09, 29 January 2007 (EST) |
||
*I think this article will end up being more of a glossary of acronyms and terms frequently found on message boards for instance rather than a glossary of terms used here. In fact since a wiki makes it so easy to link to other articles we wouldn't even need a glossary for terms here. But, yeah, I think it's helpful to provide a glossary of terms used frequently on message boards, we just need to keep it listed as a fan creation since it's not canonical. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 11:18, 29 January 2007 (EST)) |
*I think this article will end up being more of a glossary of acronyms and terms frequently found on message boards for instance rather than a glossary of terms used here. In fact since a wiki makes it so easy to link to other articles we wouldn't even need a glossary for terms here. But, yeah, I think it's helpful to provide a glossary of terms used frequently on message boards, we just need to keep it listed as a fan creation since it's not canonical. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 11:18, 29 January 2007 (EST)) |
||
**I don't think I thieved the template for horizontal TOC's (the one that's just A - B - C... across the top of the page) and can't for the life of me remember a)who uses it and b) what it's called, but it would be very well suited to this article (lots of short, alphabetical sections).--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 11:32, 29 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 16:32, 29 January 2007
So, do we want an article like this one? -- Cuardin 10:58, 29 January 2007 (EST)
- It's definitely a good idea (although we do tend to avoid these acronyms in articles, with the exception of AWI, it's still a pretty important reference). Nice job! Any idea "BWM" stands for?--Hardvice (talk) 11:09, 29 January 2007 (EST)
- I think this article will end up being more of a glossary of acronyms and terms frequently found on message boards for instance rather than a glossary of terms used here. In fact since a wiki makes it so easy to link to other articles we wouldn't even need a glossary for terms here. But, yeah, I think it's helpful to provide a glossary of terms used frequently on message boards, we just need to keep it listed as a fan creation since it's not canonical. (Admin 11:18, 29 January 2007 (EST))
- I don't think I thieved the template for horizontal TOC's (the one that's just A - B - C... across the top of the page) and can't for the life of me remember a)who uses it and b) what it's called, but it would be very well suited to this article (lots of short, alphabetical sections).--Hardvice (talk) 11:32, 29 January 2007 (EST)