Template talk:GNcharacternav

I like the links to the other categories, but now for some reason I think it would look better with the content left-aligned instead of centered.--Hardvice (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2007 (EST)

I perfer it centered, but I'm not picky on this one. Left is fine, too, if somebody wants to change it. - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 09:05, 20 January 2007 (EST)

Crowded

Wow. This bad boy is very, very, very crowded. What should we do about it? Navs for each individual GN would be ridiculous, but I can't think of anything else.---- 19:52, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

• Obviously we'll do a second-season nav bar, but that doesn't really help this one. Perhaps after the second season or so we could split it into character-specific GN navbars (like all the people that appear in Hana's GNs, or all the people that appear in Ted's GNs), but that wouldn't be for awhile, and it still doesn't help the problem now. We could split it alphabetically, but I don't think that's a good idea either. I don't see a good solution. I think it'll just pretty big and that's gonna hafta work. :( — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
• Perhaps split it into two (not with any category markers on the left side), named characters & unnamed characters, on the same bar. Actually - I'll play with it and let you see it. ---- 23:37, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
  • That didn't work... nevermind...---- 23:43, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
    • I honestly don't think there's any problem with how it looks. Even after another dozen or so people, I still think it'll be fine. A bit large, but not unreasonable. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
      • Maybe we could split into named and unnamed characters. --Hero!^(talk)_(contribs)
        • It's not a bad idea to organize it, but it certainly wouldn't make it any smaller--in fact, it would be slightly larger. It would also make it a little harder to find a particular name--rather than checking one alphabetical list, one would have to check two alphabetical lists. I still don't think there's anything wrong with it as it is. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2007 (EDT)