This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Disintegration
| Ability Naming Conventions | |
|---|---|
| The following sources are used for determining evolved human ability names, in order: | |
| 1. Canon Sources | Episodes |
| 2. Near-canon Sources | Webisodes, Graphic Novels, iStories, Heroes Evolutions |
| 3. Secondary Sources | Episode commentary, Interviews, Heroes: Survival |
| 4. Common names for abilities | Names from other works |
| 5. Descriptions of abilities | Descriptions |
6. Possessor's name |
If no non-speculative description is possible |
my two cents...
just merge it with Trevor's ability, and call it shattering. at the very least we should ask BTE if the two abilities are the same, or even similar. --Piemanmoo`
- We can't call Trevor's ability shattering because no concensus was reached and Tom can't have Trevor's ability. --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 05:07, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Name
- I think Molecular destabilisation would be a good name because it seems that the ornament has been destablised, not shattered. --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 05:07, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- I'd call it Resonant Molecular Destabilization because the ornament vibrated quickly before destabilizing, which could be because of a high-pitched sound that human's cannot hear, and it reaches the resonant pitch where the molecules just fall apart. --Madheroesfan 06:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- It could be due to high-pitched sound, but that is speculative. I think this would be a great place to test out Consensus check 2.0. Remember to only enter your name and a reason under the power name that you oppose. --Radicell 06:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Can you guys remember to leave a space between the last sig and the next ability name? There are some blocks that almost made me miss an possible name. Also leaving links for the two names I added: crumbling and collapsing. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- It could be due to high-pitched sound, but that is speculative. I think this would be a great place to test out Consensus check 2.0. Remember to only enter your name and a reason under the power name that you oppose. --Radicell 06:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Merge with Trevor's ability
- Sound effects and other cues distinguish it from Trevor's ability; I highly doubt it's the same ability. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 07:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, Tom cannot have Trevor's ability. --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 07:52, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Too speculative. -- Altes 08:57, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Not the same --Action Figure 11:51, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, not the same, different effects. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Molecular destabilization
- Incredibly speculative. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 07:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- The ornament just broke into pieces, not into molecules. -- Altes 08:57, 21 *Too speculative. --Piemanmoo 10:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- --Action Figure 11:51, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- NO! Just no! --Isaac Mendez 14:22, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, too speculative. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Resonant molecular destabilization
- Incredibly speculative. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 07:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- The same as above. -- Altes 08:57, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Too long and speculative. --Piemanmoo 10:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- --Action Figure 11:51, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, same reasons as Piemanmoo. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Shattering
- I say it fits better for Trevor's ability. -- Altes 08:57, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- This isn't what happened. --Action Figure 11:51, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed. Doesn't look much like shattering to me. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Disintegration
- Neither the angel nor the glasses were disintegrated.--Laudo 08:56, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Agreed. --Cro Magnon 09:50, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, no disintegration. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Matter obliteration
- The matter in question wasn't obliterated completely... it was fragmented. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 07:36, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, same reason as Thrashmeister. --Elemental Manipulator [ U | T | C ] - When in doubt, ask BTE 07:52, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- The same. -- Altes 08:57, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Ditto. --Cro Magnon 09:50, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Obliteration would mean it nearly ceases to exist, all this did was make it crumble into pieces.--Piemanmoo 10:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Ditto --Action Figure 11:51, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Opposed, there was no obliteration. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Telekinetic Disintegration
- Incredibly speculative. -Sincerely, Thrashmeister » talk- 12:24, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Nothing suggests he's telekinetic. And if it is related to telekinesis, Sylar would be able to do it already. Also incredibly speculative, as put by Thrashmeister. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:17, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
Crumbling
Collapsing
Gesture
When Tom uses this ability, does he makes the same hand gesture as Trevor? NuparuMahnika
- Nope, Trevor held his hand like a gun. Why, I have a name - Gun mimicry!))) -- Altes 08:49, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Linderman never kissed people when healing them, but Ishi did. Gestures seem to be more of a personal preference rather than a required aspect. --Piemanmoo 10:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Well, apart from kiss, there were no other effects. I always expected that healing should be going with some sort of light, but it never did. -- Altes 11:08, 21 April 2009 (EDT)
- Linderman never kissed people when healing them, but Ishi did. Gestures seem to be more of a personal preference rather than a required aspect. --Piemanmoo 10:25, 21 April 2009 (EDT)