Talk:Nathan Petrelli (exposed future)

Dead?

Do we know for sure that he is dead? Remember Sylar started cutting Elle's skull and she survived. Granted Peter cut him more than Sylar did Elle we don't know for sure if he is dead. Especially since Claire is in the other room and can heal him with her blood. I think we should put unknown, because the cutting of the skull doesn't hit the brain, as we saw when Sylar attacked Claire.--BlueRavenBoy 19:03, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

He lost a lot of blood...and even if she did heal him with her blood he would have still died...again... - Cael 19:28, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

I don't understand what you are trying to say, if Claire healed him before her died, or even after he died. Why would he of died again? Because of the world blowing up? With that logic all of the future characters should be dead.--BlueRavenBoy 20:18, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

I don't understand how Elle and Angela were up and walking again the same day Sylar and Peter sliced into their skulls. Surely having your skull cracked would require surgery and not just a fancy bandage? Revengeance 00:57, 8 November 2008 (EST)

Perhaps Sylar hadn't actually cut the skull, but just the flesh. Or perhaps it's one of those things we're just meant to accept and move on. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:14, 8 November 2008 (EST)

I'm sick of those things. :(! Revengeance 01:40, 9 November 2008 (EST)

Change Exposed, to Villains

Isn't this Nathan from Villain's future? Because when Future Peter brought Peter to the future it was after Nathan was shot therefore there was no exposed future at the time. --BlueRavenBoy 19:21, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

• As of now, "exposed future" refers to both Future Peter's and the new timeline, and "Villains future" refers to the timeline where Tokyo blows up. - Josh (talk/contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

Press conference

Shouldn't something be said about Nathan giving the press conference and not being shot, just as Peter Petrelli (exposed future) and Claire Bennet (exposed future) each cover both versions of the exposed future? - Josh (talk/contribs) 18:54, 4 December 2008 (EST)

• I don't understand what you're suggesting. I also don't know what you mean about multiple versions of the exposed future. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:20, 4 December 2008 (EST)
  • There's the one Future Peter came from (shown in The Second Coming,) and the one he created when he went back and shot Nathan (shown in I Am Become Death and Resistance.) The Future Peter and Future Claire pages each cover both, and so should this one. - Josh (talk/contribs) 23:29, 4 December 2008 (EST)
    • Ah, okay, I think I understand what you're talking about. It sounds like you're saying that F_Peter and F_Claire's pages have histories for The Second Coming as well as for I Am Become Death and Resistance. That's because those two characters appeared in all three of those works. F_Nathan only appeared in I Am Become Death. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2008 (EST)
    • Incidentally, the two futures you are talking about are the same future. We are calling it "exposed future" for some reason. It was confirmed by writers. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 00:13, 5 December 2008 (EST)
      • That's why I want to include Peter's mention of Nathan revealing his ability on this page: It's Nathan in the same future. - Josh (talk/contribs) 00:43, 5 December 2008 (EST)
        • But Peter's talking about Nathan from 2007, not Nathan in 2011. This page is about Nathan in 2011. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:03, 5 December 2008 (EST)