User talk:Perullama429: Difference between revisions
imported>Ryangibsonstewart Goofs |
imported>Heroe m →Goofs: rmv red link |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Goofs == |
== Goofs == |
||
I was going to write an article for |
I was going to write an article for goofs, but haven't yet because 1)there's plenty of other things to do, and 2)We don't really have a category set up for it. It doesn't belong in [[:Category:Fan Creations]], but go ahead and put it in there for now. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 17:02, 20 May 2007 (EDT) |
||
* Loose in [[:Category:Production]] would work, too.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:02, 20 May 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:18, 26 May 2007
Archiving
Since it's your talk page you can really do whatever you want, but I thought I'd let you know how most people clean their talk pages. You can create an archive for old conversations by creating a new page. For instance, begin a page called something like "User talk:Perullama429/Archive". Then copy all your old conversations (which can be found here) and paste them into the new page. A link on top of this page to your archive page is also a good idea....Again, you're not required to archive anything if you don't want to, but it's often a good idea to hold on to old conversations in case somebody needs to look something up or you need to see what somebody told you, or whatever. Just a suggestion. Let me know if you need any help. :) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 10:04, 4 May 2007 (EDT)
Goofs
I was going to write an article for goofs, but haven't yet because 1)there's plenty of other things to do, and 2)We don't really have a category set up for it. It doesn't belong in Category:Fan Creations, but go ahead and put it in there for now. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
- Loose in Category:Production would work, too.--Hardvice (talk) 18:02, 20 May 2007 (EDT)