This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Fan Creation talk:Unexpected Heroes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart →Lynette: new section |
imported>Boycool42 |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
What's her power, [[waffle]]kinesis? Very cool! :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:12, 28 September 2009 (EDT) |
What's her power, [[waffle]]kinesis? Very cool! :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:12, 28 September 2009 (EDT) |
||
*haha almost. It's breakfast vision! I'm glad you like it.--[[User:Cairoi|Cairoi]] 23:30, 28 September 2009 (EDT) |
|||
*Wow, Lynette is really awesome in a funny and creepy way.--[[User:Boycool42|Boycool42]] 07:58, 24 February 2010 (EST) |
|||
Latest revision as of 12:58, 24 February 2010
-We created this and put it into fan creations to try and make it popular. Why would you move it out if it wasn't popular? No one's going to see it now in our userspace. We've worked hard on this and were hoping that this website might help us gain readers. --Cairoi 12:11, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- The idea of this wiki is not to promote websites, but document them. We only document popular websites which yours is not at the moment. If you are trying to make your site popular then you are in the wrong place I am afraid. If you want to make it popular then it will be hard work, this site had to advertise to get where it is today, costing thousands of $'s. I do wish you the best of luck though. --Skywalkerrbf 12:17, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- Personally I really like it, and I don't see anything wrong with putting it the main namespace. I don't know any rule against documenting "unpopular" websites, or how we would judge which sites are popular and which aren't. If it's a fan creation about Heroes, I have no problem with the article. However, I should point out the Heroes Wiki is not a platform for advertising fan creations or for making other people's sites more popular. Heroes Wiki's mission is simply to archive everything to do with Heroes. That said, I would create a couple more comics (I only see one so far), and I'm sure nobody would balk at moving this good article about a really funny and well-drawn comic out of the user namespace and into the main namespace. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:20, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- (I was just going from what Baldbobbo said when he moved the page.)--Skywalkerrbf 12:28, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- No worries, no hard feelings or anything...I'm just telling my opinion, which is different than yours, or at least different than Bob's. I don't personally have any objections to an article about a fan creation that's not very popular, but I do think the page would stand a lot better on its own if there were a few more comics than just the one. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I was just trying to be consistent with what we've done in the past. There are a lot of user-created fan material, and we start them on user namespace before moving it to the main namespace. I know the exceptions have been very popular ones or ones that have a lot of content. Personally, I think popularity has something to do with it to avoid self-promotion. Again, I don't really follow a lot of fan-generated material, but some of them I've heard of, and this isn't one (no offense).--Bob (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I don't follow a lot of fan creations, either Bob. Is that what we've done in the past? Have we allowed or disallowed articles based on their popularity? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I just wanted to say sorry for overreacting. We understand the circumstances and stuff and we're not going to be ridiculous about it. Sorry if we came off as rude. We can't say we really knew what the requirements were to fit on the main page. --Cairoi 13:28, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- No, don't be sorry. As we said, once you get some more content on the site, I don't think it'd be a stretch to say that it can be moved to the mainspace. And Ryan, I don't think we necessarily "disallow" anyone. To my knowlege though, some pages, like Zeroes, went straight to main namespace, while others were moved to user namespace until they were further developed.--Bob (talk) 13:35, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- Oh, I didn't know. I don't follow the fan creation too much. Cairoi, I'm excited to see the next few comics you guys make! :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:53, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- No, don't be sorry. As we said, once you get some more content on the site, I don't think it'd be a stretch to say that it can be moved to the mainspace. And Ryan, I don't think we necessarily "disallow" anyone. To my knowlege though, some pages, like Zeroes, went straight to main namespace, while others were moved to user namespace until they were further developed.--Bob (talk) 13:35, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I just wanted to say sorry for overreacting. We understand the circumstances and stuff and we're not going to be ridiculous about it. Sorry if we came off as rude. We can't say we really knew what the requirements were to fit on the main page. --Cairoi 13:28, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I don't follow a lot of fan creations, either Bob. Is that what we've done in the past? Have we allowed or disallowed articles based on their popularity? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:58, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- I was just trying to be consistent with what we've done in the past. There are a lot of user-created fan material, and we start them on user namespace before moving it to the main namespace. I know the exceptions have been very popular ones or ones that have a lot of content. Personally, I think popularity has something to do with it to avoid self-promotion. Again, I don't really follow a lot of fan-generated material, but some of them I've heard of, and this isn't one (no offense).--Bob (talk) 12:54, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- No worries, no hard feelings or anything...I'm just telling my opinion, which is different than yours, or at least different than Bob's. I don't personally have any objections to an article about a fan creation that's not very popular, but I do think the page would stand a lot better on its own if there were a few more comics than just the one. :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- (I was just going from what Baldbobbo said when he moved the page.)--Skywalkerrbf 12:28, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
- Personally I really like it, and I don't see anything wrong with putting it the main namespace. I don't know any rule against documenting "unpopular" websites, or how we would judge which sites are popular and which aren't. If it's a fan creation about Heroes, I have no problem with the article. However, I should point out the Heroes Wiki is not a platform for advertising fan creations or for making other people's sites more popular. Heroes Wiki's mission is simply to archive everything to do with Heroes. That said, I would create a couple more comics (I only see one so far), and I'm sure nobody would balk at moving this good article about a really funny and well-drawn comic out of the user namespace and into the main namespace. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:20, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Lynette
What's her power, wafflekinesis? Very cool! :) -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2009 (EDT)