This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Theory talk:Rapid cell regeneration: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>SacValleyDweller New page: ==Claire does not have pierced ears== Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings? |
imported>Intuitive Empath No edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Claire does not have pierced ears== |
==Claire does not have pierced ears== |
||
Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings? |
Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings as proof?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 02:19, 24 November 2007 (EST) |
||
* Here are a few shots: [[:Image:S320x240.jpg|1]], [[:Image:Powers claire refinery jump 2.jpg|2]], and [[:Image:Powers future sylar claire pwned.jpg|3]]. See all of [[:Category:Images of Claire Bennet|Claire's images]]. Sometimes Claire wears earrings, sometimes she doesn't. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}} 14:20, 19 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
**We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of [[rapid cell regeneration]], something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
**I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST) |
|||
==Claire's hair== |
|||
I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) [[User:Lililedger|Lililedger]] 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
*At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
**Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? [[User:Lililedger|Lavi]] 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
***The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
****Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) [[User:Lililedger|Lavi]] 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
***** I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- [[User:Altes|Altes]] 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
****** Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. [[User:Lililedger|Lavi]] 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
******* Who knows? Maybe there is a psychological factor in her ability that heals her to what her or her body thinks it should be, or maybe there is a "minimum damage" so that her body will heal, otherwise her hair would grow even if she decided to but it shorter. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 15:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:34, 16 July 2009
Claire does not have pierced ears
Unless Im mistaken, Clair does not have pierced ears. If I am mistaken, can I have a screenshot of these earings as proof?--SacValleyDweller (talk) 02:19, 24 November 2007 (EST)
- Here are a few shots: 1, 2, and 3. See all of Claire's images. Sometimes Claire wears earrings, sometimes she doesn't. --Ice Vision (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- We should probably mention something very simple in the Notes of rapid cell regeneration, something like, "Claire's healing ability does not seem to affect her pierced ears." -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:06, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- I sancorected, thanks Ice. Hmmmmmmmmmm.... --SacValleyDweller (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)
Claire's hair
I wasn't sure where to put this little comment, but... As hair is made up of dead skin follicles, should Claire's hair grow back after being burned off? (Or, indeed, grow at all?) Lililedger 21:43, 14 July 2009 (EDT)
- At the root, the hair is alive, you don't feel pain if someone cuts your hair, but you feel pain if someone pulls it. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 12:54, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? Lavi 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--Catalyst · Talk · HL 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) Lavi 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- Altes 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
- Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. Lavi 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
- Who knows? Maybe there is a psychological factor in her ability that heals her to what her or her body thinks it should be, or maybe there is a "minimum damage" so that her body will heal, otherwise her hair would grow even if she decided to but it shorter. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 15:34, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
- Yes, but that comes back to my original arguement: Claire's body shouldn't be healing cells that are SUPPOSED to be dead. Logically, her hair shouldn't regenerate. I say the creators just forgot. Lavi 10:03, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
- I guess Ted just burnt hot, not radioactive... That's the only explanation. As for Peter and Nathan, we don't know - Nathan was injected with Adam's blood after all... Ad as for Claire's hair - I think it regenerated faster than the rest of her body. -- Altes 04:24, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
- Okay, I'm gonna let it drop because I'm pretty sure it was just a small oversight, but her hair never should've 'repaired itself' after being burned by Ted's radioactivity. It should've had to grow back naturally, as her body wouldn't register the absence of dead cells. (Speaking of Ted, I'm AMAZED none of them have cancer...) Lavi 19:53, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- The your hair will grow back because your roots are alive.--Catalyst · Talk · HL 18:33, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
- Then shouldn't only her roots grow back? Lavi 18:26, 15 July 2009 (EDT)