This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Powers/Test: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart one minor change, and let's do it |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[User:Orne|Orne]], thanks for working on this page. It looks great! I especially love how you incorporated the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled aspect of the powers into the page. Bravo! ... I'm not sure which model is the best for the page though. I like the info here, but I like the layout of the regular [[Powers]] page better. Maybe we can incorporate the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled info into the main page? What do you think? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 15:54, 2 December 2006 (EST) |
[[User:Orne|Orne]], thanks for working on this page. It looks great! I especially love how you incorporated the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled aspect of the powers into the page. Bravo! ... I'm not sure which model is the best for the page though. I like the info here, but I like the layout of the regular [[Powers]] page better. Maybe we can incorporate the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled info into the main page? What do you think? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 15:54, 2 December 2006 (EST) |
||
* I actually really like this as the main powers page. I wouldn't worry too much about the loss of the section headings; the links will still work, they just won't "jump" to the specific power, but since the list is shorter and much easier to read, that's not much of a concern.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:17, 2 December 2006 (EST) |
* I actually really like this as the main powers page. I wouldn't worry too much about the loss of the section headings; the links will still work, they just won't "jump" to the specific power, but since the list is shorter and much easier to read, that's not much of a concern.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:17, 2 December 2006 (EST) |
||
**I think my issue with it is that there's not quite enough space between each power. I'm assuming we could add just a little room (so it's more attractive to my Type-B eyes) between each power - then I'd say fine, let's go with it. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 16:39, 2 December 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 21:39, 2 December 2006
Orne, thanks for working on this page. It looks great! I especially love how you incorporated the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled aspect of the powers into the page. Bravo! ... I'm not sure which model is the best for the page though. I like the info here, but I like the layout of the regular Powers page better. Maybe we can incorporate the controlled/automatic/uncontrolled info into the main page? What do you think? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2006 (EST)
- I actually really like this as the main powers page. I wouldn't worry too much about the loss of the section headings; the links will still work, they just won't "jump" to the specific power, but since the list is shorter and much easier to read, that's not much of a concern.--Hardvice (talk) 16:17, 2 December 2006 (EST)
- I think my issue with it is that there's not quite enough space between each power. I'm assuming we could add just a little room (so it's more attractive to my Type-B eyes) between each power - then I'd say fine, let's go with it. :) - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2006 (EST)