Theory:Sylar's paintings: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:35, 2 February 2008

Theories about Sylar's paintings

The following fan theories are about Sylar's paintings.

For help on adding theories, see the help section.

Theory	Citations	Notes
Sylar sees a "warped" version of the events in his paintings due to his mental instability.	None	• Sylar could simply be a bad painter, or perhaps he just has different taste in art. • Peter Petrelli also said he couldn't paint but his paintings came out similar to the ones Isaac Mendez paints. • The weird style of Sylar's paintings is a design element to reflect his evil nature. • It's possible that when Sylar paints an event, he paints an outcome of the event in which he gets what he wants or desires. • Sylar's paintings appear to be symbolic of events, rather then actually depicting them as Isaac's or Peter's do. For example, the painting depicting him alongside Ted Sprague seems to indicate some kind of battle about to take place, yet when the prophecy is achieved Sylar kills him without resistance. The painting looks nothing like the actual scene.

Theories

edit

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {{note}} The weird style of Sylar's paintings is a design element to reflect his evil nature.<br>
 {{note}} It's possible that when Sylar paints an event, he paints an outcome of the event in which he gets what he wants or desires.
+{{note}} Sylar's paintings appear to be ''symbolic'' of events, rather then actually depicting them as Isaac's or Peter's do. For example, the painting depicting him alongside Ted Sprague seems to indicate some kind of battle about to take place, yet when the prophecy is achieved Sylar kills him without resistance. The painting looks nothing like the actual scene.
 |-
 |}