Theory talk:The Company's founders: Difference between revisions
imported>Hardvice New page: ==Weird note== "This was also a group of people with superpowers so they couldn't just get any photographer to take the picture." Whuzah? Huh? Why not, exactly? It's not like any of th... |
imported>Baldbobbo |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Whuzah? Huh? Why not, exactly? It's not like any of them is on fire or shooting lightning bolts out of their eyes. I think they probably could have hired a photographer and said something like "hi, we're a group of twelve friends and we'd like you to take our picture" instead of "hi, we're a group of twelve people with kick-ass superpowers and we'd like you to take our picture". I mean, yes, Adam is a logical choice for the photographer, since he doesn't appear to be in the photo, but the statement above just doesn't make any sense or provide any support for the theory. Now, if it was "the group is a secret organization and they wouldn't want to be associated with one another, so they couldn't use an outside photographer", I could see the point -- though of course neither the notion that it's a secret group nor that they all had powers is really confirmed in the show.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 12:26, 8 November 2007 (EST) |
Whuzah? Huh? Why not, exactly? It's not like any of them is on fire or shooting lightning bolts out of their eyes. I think they probably could have hired a photographer and said something like "hi, we're a group of twelve friends and we'd like you to take our picture" instead of "hi, we're a group of twelve people with kick-ass superpowers and we'd like you to take our picture". I mean, yes, Adam is a logical choice for the photographer, since he doesn't appear to be in the photo, but the statement above just doesn't make any sense or provide any support for the theory. Now, if it was "the group is a secret organization and they wouldn't want to be associated with one another, so they couldn't use an outside photographer", I could see the point -- though of course neither the notion that it's a secret group nor that they all had powers is really confirmed in the show.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 12:26, 8 November 2007 (EST) |
||
*That's why I stay away from theory pages.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 12:30, 8 November 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 17:30, 8 November 2007
Weird note
"This was also a group of people with superpowers so they couldn't just get any photographer to take the picture."
Whuzah? Huh? Why not, exactly? It's not like any of them is on fire or shooting lightning bolts out of their eyes. I think they probably could have hired a photographer and said something like "hi, we're a group of twelve friends and we'd like you to take our picture" instead of "hi, we're a group of twelve people with kick-ass superpowers and we'd like you to take our picture". I mean, yes, Adam is a logical choice for the photographer, since he doesn't appear to be in the photo, but the statement above just doesn't make any sense or provide any support for the theory. Now, if it was "the group is a secret organization and they wouldn't want to be associated with one another, so they couldn't use an outside photographer", I could see the point -- though of course neither the notion that it's a secret group nor that they all had powers is really confirmed in the show.--Hardvice (talk) 12:26, 8 November 2007 (EST)