iStory talk:The Private/chapter summaries: Difference between revisions
imported>MiamiVolts m Talk:List of The Private chapters moved to Talk:The Private chapter summaries: per discussion on talk page, it is not a list |
imported>MiamiVolts |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Got nothing against it, but to be honest it doesn't seem obvious that "The Private" is the name of a iStory series and seems more like "private" is describing "chapter summaries". Although I guess it's the same with the current title. Damn, they gotta stop making titles called "The XXXXX". --[[User:Radicell|Radicell]] 09:11, 14 January 2009 (EST) |
*Got nothing against it, but to be honest it doesn't seem obvious that "The Private" is the name of a iStory series and seems more like "private" is describing "chapter summaries". Although I guess it's the same with the current title. Damn, they gotta stop making titles called "The XXXXX". --[[User:Radicell|Radicell]] 09:11, 14 January 2009 (EST) |
||
** If there's no objections, I'll move it over tomorrow morning.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 15:15, 14 January 2009 (EST) |
** If there's no objections, I'll move it over tomorrow morning.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 15:15, 14 January 2009 (EST) |
||
*** Ok, it's been moved.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 03:48, 15 January 2009 (EST) |
|||
==The code== |
==The code== |
||
Revision as of 08:48, 15 January 2009
A list?
This is more the page for summaries than a list. Perhaps we should call it "The Private chapter summaries"? Thoughts?--MiamiVolts (talk) 08:41, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- Got nothing against it, but to be honest it doesn't seem obvious that "The Private" is the name of a iStory series and seems more like "private" is describing "chapter summaries". Although I guess it's the same with the current title. Damn, they gotta stop making titles called "The XXXXX". --Radicell 09:11, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- If there's no objections, I'll move it over tomorrow morning.--MiamiVolts (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- Ok, it's been moved.--MiamiVolts (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2009 (EST)
- If there's no objections, I'll move it over tomorrow morning.--MiamiVolts (talk) 15:15, 14 January 2009 (EST)
The code
Looks like Morse code to me, but maybe that's too simple. Thoughts?--MiamiVolts (talk) 08:53, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- If it were Morse code, it reads DF/ONRK/COME/GET/HERRK
This is assuming that ._._._ means RK (since there is no letter that ._._._ represents, while ._. represents R and _._ represents K). Someone should check my work to see if I've made a mistake, one of the options in the poll DFONCO comes to mind from DF/ONRK/COME/GET/HERRK =/ --Radicell 09:19, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- Whoa, never mind, ._._._ is actually a period. So that makes it DF/ON./COME/GET/HER. I guess we should choose the DFONCO option then. --Radicell 09:21, 14 January 2009 (EST)
Timeline
Okay, clearly they're no longer paying any attention to when things are going on. The incident at Pinehearst happened in March 2007. The time period that Rachel got recruited was listed as 2008 in the last iStory. This time, it's apparently 2009, thinking back on the SUMMER of 2008. Ridiculous. --Ricard Desi (t,c) 12:11, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- I guess all of the characters who can time travel have left a disturbance in the continuum.--Piemanmoo 12:15, 14 January 2009 (EST)
- Actually, I think it is likely the writers' error and should be corrected. Whether it will or not, I'm not sure.--MiamiVolts (talk) 15:13, 14 January 2009 (EST)