Talk:Eric Thompson, Sr.: Difference between revisions
imported>Level Archives |
imported>Tim Thomason |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Anybody else notice it seemed like half Thompson's face was in darkness for a lot of his shots? --[[User:Frantik|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik|Talk]]) 00:05, 27 February 2007 (EST) |
Anybody else notice it seemed like half Thompson's face was in darkness for a lot of his shots? --[[User:Frantik|Frantik]] ([[User talk:Frantik|Talk]]) 00:05, 27 February 2007 (EST) |
||
==History merge== |
|||
: ''From [[Talk:Company field leader]]'' |
|||
Sorry to post here, but this concerns the redirect and not the article on Thompson. |
|||
This page needs to be properly merged (delete Thompson, move this there, then restore Thompson and rollback) in order to attribute the HDYSAEM sections on Thompson's page with this page's authors. Regardless of the licensing, that just seems like the right thing to do.--[[User:Tim Thomason|Tim Thomason]] 20:02, 6 June 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* We can merge this discussion history with the discussion history at [[Talk:Thompson]] if needed, but it seems kind of pointless. There are no open discussions on this page (save this thread), so this page serves as an [[:Category:archive|archive]] of previous discussions. As the link above says, any new discussions should be posted on [[Talk:Thompson]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:51, 6 June 2007 (EDT) |
|||
::Sorry, let me rephrase that. [[Company field leader]] (not the talk page) needs to be ''properly'' merged with [[Thompson]] in my opinion, as the section on Thompson's Cfl days appears to be a copy-and-paste move. If we merge them together (as opposed to simply making the one a redirect as it currently is) then the history will show the natural progression of the page and character.--[[User:Tim Thomason|Tim Thomason]] 18:28, 8 June 2007 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 22:28, 8 June 2007
| Archives | Archived Topics |
|---|---|
| Company field leader Feb-May 2007 | Government or AWI • Who is this guy?! • Name Change • Heroes Interactive (The Hard Part) |
Thompson as Human vs Evolved Human
Thompson (along with many many others) has not shown any evidence of powers as of yet. I think he should go in Category:Humans until he proves otherwise. Anybody agree/disagree? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:07, 3 January 2007 (EST)
- My opinion was that he shouldn't go into either category until we know more. He'll still be in the "Characters" category. --Ted C 15:15, 3 January 2007 (EST)
- Category:Humans clearly states that it's for anyone who hasn't displayed powers. The division isn't into normal humans and evolved humans, it's into confirmed evolved humans and everyone else. Micah was in "Humans"until he used his powers; so was Hana. "Humans" and "Evolved Humans" should be exhaustive.--Hardvice (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2007 (EST)
- Very well. --Ted C 15:24, 3 January 2007 (EST)
- Category:Humans clearly states that it's for anyone who hasn't displayed powers. The division isn't into normal humans and evolved humans, it's into confirmed evolved humans and everyone else. Micah was in "Humans"until he used his powers; so was Hana. "Humans" and "Evolved Humans" should be exhaustive.--Hardvice (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2007 (EST)
face half in darkness
Anybody else notice it seemed like half Thompson's face was in darkness for a lot of his shots? --Frantik (Talk) 00:05, 27 February 2007 (EST)
History merge
Sorry to post here, but this concerns the redirect and not the article on Thompson.
This page needs to be properly merged (delete Thompson, move this there, then restore Thompson and rollback) in order to attribute the HDYSAEM sections on Thompson's page with this page's authors. Regardless of the licensing, that just seems like the right thing to do.--Tim Thomason 20:02, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
- We can merge this discussion history with the discussion history at Talk:Thompson if needed, but it seems kind of pointless. There are no open discussions on this page (save this thread), so this page serves as an archive of previous discussions. As the link above says, any new discussions should be posted on Talk:Thompson. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
- Sorry, let me rephrase that. Company field leader (not the talk page) needs to be properly merged with Thompson in my opinion, as the section on Thompson's Cfl days appears to be a copy-and-paste move. If we merge them together (as opposed to simply making the one a redirect as it currently is) then the history will show the natural progression of the page and character.--Tim Thomason 18:28, 8 June 2007 (EDT)