This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Evolution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ice Vision No edit summary |
imported>Baldbobbo |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
***** Doesn't make it any less of a "Scientific Theory." Just means it has a "Scientific Theory" to go against it.--[[User:Riddler|Riddler]] 21:44, 22 November 2007 (EST) |
***** Doesn't make it any less of a "Scientific Theory." Just means it has a "Scientific Theory" to go against it.--[[User:Riddler|Riddler]] 21:44, 22 November 2007 (EST) |
||
****** I guess you're right. It should stay, then.--[[User:Ice Vision|Ice Vision]] 22:09, 22 November 2007 (EST) |
****** I guess you're right. It should stay, then.--[[User:Ice Vision|Ice Vision]] 22:09, 22 November 2007 (EST) |
||
*** The special relativity theory can be considered a "scientific theory" because it pertains to science. The reasoning behind it being "scientific" versus simply being "theory" is because of its relevance to real life versus the show. We don't call most of these [[theories]] "scientific" because they don't pertain to real life.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 02:53, 23 November 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 07:53, 23 November 2007
Stub?
What can this page use to not be stubby? --Frantik (Talk) 23:27, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
- It looks pretty good to me. I guess it could use a pretty good "About" section that explains the background of evolution ... but it seems pretty complete to me. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 08:34, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
Opening sentence
I think we should change the phrse 'the scientific theory' in the opening paragraph to 'the theory', because there's nothing remotely scientific about the theory.--Yamawhata? 18:51, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Um.....yeeeeeeaaaahhhhh. --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 19:06, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- A Pandora's box is about to open... I'd say go ahead and change it. A theory is a theory, and, the theory of evolution, like any other theory, is merely a theory. Classifying it as scientific is an opinion.--Ice Vision 21:30, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Weather you agree to it or not, it IS a "Scientific theory" because it is a theory in which there is scientific evidence to back it. That's what makes it "scientific." :|--Riddler 21:33, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- I really shouldn't be feeding the fire. Oh, well... Although this theory has scientific evidence, it can be disproved by science. That's what I hear, anyway.--Ice Vision 21:41, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Doesn't make it any less of a "Scientific Theory." Just means it has a "Scientific Theory" to go against it.--Riddler 21:44, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- I guess you're right. It should stay, then.--Ice Vision 22:09, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- Doesn't make it any less of a "Scientific Theory." Just means it has a "Scientific Theory" to go against it.--Riddler 21:44, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- I really shouldn't be feeding the fire. Oh, well... Although this theory has scientific evidence, it can be disproved by science. That's what I hear, anyway.--Ice Vision 21:41, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- The special relativity theory can be considered a "scientific theory" because it pertains to science. The reasoning behind it being "scientific" versus simply being "theory" is because of its relevance to real life versus the show. We don't call most of these theories "scientific" because they don't pertain to real life.--Bob (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2007 (EST)
- Weather you agree to it or not, it IS a "Scientific theory" because it is a theory in which there is scientific evidence to back it. That's what makes it "scientific." :|--Riddler 21:33, 22 November 2007 (EST)
- A Pandora's box is about to open... I'd say go ahead and change it. A theory is a theory, and, the theory of evolution, like any other theory, is merely a theory. Classifying it as scientific is an opinion.--Ice Vision 21:30, 22 November 2007 (EST)