Talk:List of Company partnerships: Difference between revisions
imported>Ryangibsonstewart New section: Sections |
imported>DocM No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I don't think this page really needs a section for each episode--that's really what the article about [[the Company]] is for. I think it'd be neat to see this page broken into sections that list each partnership, and then have a short narrative about each partnership. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:04, 15 April 2008 (EDT) |
I don't think this page really needs a section for each episode--that's really what the article about [[the Company]] is for. I think it'd be neat to see this page broken into sections that list each partnership, and then have a short narrative about each partnership. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:04, 15 April 2008 (EDT) |
||
* That makes even more sense. --[[User:DocM|DocM]] 21:05, 15 April 2008 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 01:05, 16 April 2008
I like the idea for this page, especially in light of Chuck Kim's recent EW interview about the upcoming five-month story arc we will see in the graphic novels. However, I would call the page "Company partnerships". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- It does sound like a good idea; and I agree about "Company partnerships" as the theme's name. However, I still think it should be in the user's namespace until it's ready.--MiamiVolts (talk) 15:27, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- Why not make it a stub? We have a ton of articles in the mainspace that are not complete. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- I agree, stubify and everyone pitch in. :) ---SacValleyDweller (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- Please don't delete this page I made it. I know it is not finished but is there realy enythinh missing?Do we have eny more info then is on it already? yer we need some pics and stuff and probs a template --Rbfskywalker 17:14, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- Barring some surge of hatred from the community, I don't have any intention of deleting the page. And even in that case, I would just move it to the user namespace. It's a good idea for a page and is becoming increasingly more important to keep track of partnerships. I only wish I had thought of it first! -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:02, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- Why not make it a stub? We have a ton of articles in the mainspace that are not complete. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:39, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
Images
The two images of Noah and the Haitian are both after they ended their employment under the Company. Should we instead put in images of when they actually worked for the organization?--Paronine 18:09, 15 April 2008 (EDT) Good point, done :) --Rbfskywalker 18:22, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
Sections
I don't think this page really needs a section for each episode--that's really what the article about the Company is for. I think it'd be neat to see this page broken into sections that list each partnership, and then have a short narrative about each partnership. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:04, 15 April 2008 (EDT)
- That makes even more sense. --DocM 21:05, 15 April 2008 (EDT)