User talk:Piemanmoo

Hello, Piemanmoo

Help
General Help Characters Editing Layout Naming conventions Sources Style
Special Topics Caching Collapsible tables Consensus checks Disambiguation Images Int'l characters Interviews Quotes Portals Signatures Spoilers Tables of contents Templates Theories
For more help... Contact an administrator Admin Level Radicell RyanGibsonStewart Or leave a message Administrator Portal

Welcome to Heroes Wiki!

Here are a few links to get you started:

• If you are new to Heroes, you might want to start at the New User Portal.
• If you're not too familiar with editing Wikis, you might like to start with Help:Editing.
• If you already are familiar with wikiediting, you might want to try Help:Style.
• If you're ready to get started, Template:Todo lists some ways you can help out.
• Of course, if you have your own idea for a new article, that's great, too.
• Recent Changes will let you see others' contributions as they happen.
  • To make Recent Changes more useful for all users, remember to provide an edit summary in the Summary field before you save your changes.
  • You can set the Wiki to prompt you for a summary in your preferences.
• When posting on an article's Talk page you should add ~~~~ or click the signature button.
  • This will add a signature and timestamp to the end of your comment so others can easily tell who posted it.
  • When editing normal article pages, don't sign your contributions.
• If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to leave a message for an administrator.
• You can also customize your user page if you like.

Once again, welcome to Heroes Wiki!

---

Niki's powers

Hi, there Piemanmoo, and welcome. I reverted the change you made to Powers, and I made your edit to Broken nose guard a bit more ambiguous because Niki's powers are still unconfirmed. Personally, I happend to agree with you 100% that Niki breaking the baton was her realization of great strength, but there are a lot of others who disagree just as adamantly. In the end, it's not confirmed one way or the other. See here for a previous discussion on the topic. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2007 (EST)

Image:Pieman.GIF

Okay, you uploaded possibly my favorite user image ever. Nice. ... If you don't mind, could you put a source on the image? Even something as simple as "created by Piemanmoo" would be fine. Thanks! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 09:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)

re: happy birthday

in the last 60 seconds. woo!--Piemanmoo 03:01, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

• Thank you, by my clock you were an hour late. Actually I was born later in the day so it is alright, and you said it before anyone in my family. -Lөvөl 12:54, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

I think Ryan is right...

I have only been on this site for a short while, but what I know is that all of the Administrators are doing there best to have both consensus and accuracy. I think we should be grateful that these guys are so helpful. Your comments about where to draw the line, "crossed the line (lol)" and I feel that this was inappropriate. It is quite obvious that accurate ability naming has been an ongoing struggle for this site, and I feel that the administrators have developed a wonderful system. If you do not agree that is fine, but criticizing a plan that has been months in the making and still in its first stages is unfair. You should be supportive of these individuals. Random guy 21:59, 4 December 2007 (EST)

• I agree that they've all worked very hard on the site and the systems, but please don't think that I'm not supporting the admins themselves. I'm just trying to explain how I think the system could be changed using constructive criticism. To me, the problems is deciding on what is cannon and what is speculation. If we could create a system to identify that, and then combine it with the current power naming system, it would be pefect. But obviously, this is just my opinion and I wouldn't want anyone to see it as me trying to make it anything else. --Piemanmoo 22:15, 4 December 2007 (EST)
  • Thank you Random guy, and thank you Piemanmoo. I certainly don't think you're being unsupportive of the sysops, and I understand your concern with the site's naming conventions. I did think your comments here were bordering on being antagonistic rather than helpful, but again, I understand that you were trying to play Devil's Advocate. I just didn't think the criticism was very constructive, and I wanted to let you know that. If you have an idea for how to improve our naming conventions, please present your ideas and we will listen. That doesn't mean things will change, but I can certainly say that the five administrators are not close-minded guys. But in the end, it's not even really about the admins, or supporting us, or what we think of the naming conventions. It's really up to the community and what they think. We have long long discussions so we can make sure everybody is heard and everybody's opinion is expressed. It's often impossible to reach unanimity, but we try to find consensus, or as close to it as we can, before we make major changes. Your opinion really is valued, and I always enjoy seeing your name in the recent changes for talk pages because you present your thoughts clearly and honestly. Thank you. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:39, 4 December 2007 (EST)