Help:Consensus checks: Difference between revisions
imported>Jenx222 mNo edit summary |
imported>Jenx222 m update |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{helpbox}} |
{{helpbox}} |
||
Consensuses checks are sometimes required where sufficient information is not available to make |
Consensuses checks are sometimes required where sufficient information is not available to make a valid and/or cannon decision. If a consensus is reached the article will then be renamed or moved as required. |
||
==Use== |
==Use== |
||
Consensuses checks should only be set up and used in situations where the information available is not enough to make a decision. The consensus check should run for a minimum of 24 hours before a decision is made. |
Consensuses checks should only be set up and used in situations where the information available is not enough to make a decision. The consensus check should run for a minimum of 24 hours before a decision is made. |
||
When users participate, they will be required to leave they're signature under the item/items that they are '''opposed''' to, with a basic explanation as to why the item is unsuitable. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
'''The Consensus check should - ''' |
|||
*Have at least 2 options available with space to add additional options |
|||
*Run for a minimum of 24 hours |
|||
*Include a minimum of 10 user's input |
|||
== |
==Example== |
||
===Consensus:EXAMPLE, DAY/MONTH/YEAR TIME=== |
|||
'''Item 1'''<br/> |
|||
--User1, This option goes against all previous information and is speculative |
|||
'''Item 2'''<br/> |
|||
Before a consensus check can be created there must be a minimum amount of information available |
|||
--User2, This option is speculative at best |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- |
|||
! width="200"|Item |
|||
! width="500"|Information Required |
|||
|- |
|||
| Ability Naming |
|||
| {{note}} Basic description of the ability |
|||
{{note}} Basic visual evidence of the ability in use |
|||
|- |
|||
|} |
|||
==Format== |
==Format== |
||
When a consensus check is created it should follow a specific format. This enables us to create consistent standards throughout the Wiki. |
When a consensus check is created it should follow a specific format. This enables us to create consistent standards throughout the Wiki. |
||
<pre width="100"> |
<pre width="100"> |
||
==Consensus:ITEM NAME, DD/MMMM/YYYY TIME== |
==Consensus:ITEM NAME, DD/MMMM/YYYY TIME== |
||
'''Item 1''' |
'''Item 1''' |
||
<-- User signatures |
<-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> |
||
'''Item 2''' |
'''Item 2''' |
||
<-- User signatures |
<-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> |
||
'''Item 3''' |
'''Item 3''' |
||
<-- User signatures |
<-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> |
||
'''Other''' |
'''Other''' |
||
<-- New item names go here as well as |
<-- New item names go here as well as user signatures and reasons against the item go here --> |
||
'''Notes''' |
'''Notes''' |
||
Revision as of 21:10, 7 November 2009
| Help | |
|---|---|
| General Help | |
| Special Topics | |
| For more help...
Contact an administrator Or leave a message | |
Consensuses checks are sometimes required where sufficient information is not available to make a valid and/or cannon decision. If a consensus is reached the article will then be renamed or moved as required.
Use
Consensuses checks should only be set up and used in situations where the information available is not enough to make a decision. The consensus check should run for a minimum of 24 hours before a decision is made.
When users participate, they will be required to leave they're signature under the item/items that they are opposed to, with a basic explanation as to why the item is unsuitable.
There should be some discussion about the topic on the topic's talk page before a consensus check is created.
Example
Consensus:EXAMPLE, DAY/MONTH/YEAR TIME
Item 1
--User1, This option goes against all previous information and is speculative
Item 2
--User2, This option is speculative at best
Format
When a consensus check is created it should follow a specific format. This enables us to create consistent standards throughout the Wiki.
==Consensus:ITEM NAME, DD/MMMM/YYYY TIME== '''Item 1''' <-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> '''Item 2''' <-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> '''Item 3''' <-- User signatures and reasons against the item go here --> '''Other''' <-- New item names go here as well as user signatures and reasons against the item go here --> '''Notes''' <-- All text and notes go here -->