Category talk:Plot Points: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:03, 9 November 2006

Should plot points have episodic sections like Characters do with "Character History"? If Yes, is "Plot History" with episode references a decent name for it? --Orne 17:55, 8 November 2006 (EST)
Should Nathan's election be added as a plot point? I would suggest "The campaign" --Orne 18:33, 8 November 2006 (EST)
- Or better yet, "Nathan's campaign" since it appears so often in search --Orne 18:35, 8 November 2006 (EST)
  - Nathan's campaign sounds like a good article. There's plenty to detail, what with Linderman's money, the event where he " outs" Peter as depressive, and the brunch. Personally, I've been avoiding episodic sections on the plot points so far because most of them have been advancing so slowly, but it might not hurt to do it that way now that we have more information on a lot of them. Other opinions?--Hardvice (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2006 (EST)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 * Should [[Nathan]]'s election be added as a plot point?  I would suggest "The campaign" --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 18:33, 8 November 2006 (EST)
 **Or better yet, "Nathan's campaign" since it appears so often in search --[[User:Orne|Orne]] 18:35, 8 November 2006 (EST)
+*** [[Nathan's campaign]] sounds like a good article.  There's plenty to detail, what with Linderman's money, the event where he " outs" Peter as depressive, and the brunch.  Personally, I've been avoiding episodic sections on the plot points so far because most of them have been advancing so slowly, but it might not hurt to do it that way now that we have more information on a lot of them.  Other opinions?--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 19:03, 8 November 2006 (EST)