Graphic Novel talk:War Buddies, Part 1

New graphic novel checklist

Episode article: _X_ Graphic Novel screencap (450x350) _X_ Title screencap _X_ Blurbs _X_ Summary _X_ Easter Egg _X_ Trivia Update/add other articles: _X_ GN redirects _X_ Check that links from previous GN work _X_ Update Portal:Issues ___ Update writer's and artist's pages _X_ Update Current graphic novel checklist _X_ Update Current events _X_ Add Category:Images from War Buddies Update Main Page: _X_ Template:aotw (if needed) _X_ Template:Index

Update Character pages ___ Update Portal:Graphic Novel Characters as appropriate ___ Hana Gitelman ___ Casey Z. Smith ___ Update appearances Add references to appropriate recurring themes: ___ (list themes referenced here) Add examples of demonstrated Powers: Note: if an "examples" page exists, that's where examples should be added. ___ Electronic data transception

Events/Items/Things/References ___ The file? ___ Hana's motorcycle ___ Update Portals as needed Locations ___ Washington, DC ___ Update Portal:Graphic Novel Locations Places ___ The Pentagon ___ Le Bar ___ Update Portal:Graphic Novel Places Timeline ___ Update timeline Update templates as needed _X_ Template: GN ___ Template: GNcharacternav ___ Template: GNPlace

Title

This one's titled "War Buddy: The Lonestar File, part 1 of 6", but the Graphic Novel page just refers to it as "War Buddies". I'm not sure how we want to treat the subtitle. Maybe we should wait to see next weeks and then decide?--Hardvice (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

• Good call, let's wait. Though, if each one has a different subtitle, then "Graphic Novel:War Buddies:The Lonestar File" seems correct, with "War Buddies:The Lonestar File" as a redirect. I would also suggest, if each one has a different subtitle, that we just use "The Lonestar File" for citations....But let's wait 'till next week.— RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 07:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

The File

The title suggests it's the "Lonestar File", but it's probably too early to call it that in an article. What's a decent title for it until then? We don't really know that it's "Bennet's file". "The Pentagon file" is also a bit misleading. I'd opt for simply "the file" for now and rename it later as we find out more. Or does it not need an article yet?--Hardvice (talk) 06:16, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

• I don't see any harm in calling it the "Lonestar File" right now. But if we opt not to call it that, then we probably shouldn't write any article at all. (FYI, there is currently no article for "The file", but File redirects to File (disambig).) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 07:01, 13 March 2007 (EDT)