This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Fan Creation talk:Clach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Gargyloveswolfy |
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
**I detracted from the point of the article. |
**I detracted from the point of the article. |
||
:I think everyone needs to be careful to remember that this is a Wiki; by its nature, it's a collaboration. Nobody "owns" an article. Nobody should police an article for content they disagree with. Only information that is clearly and conclusively wrong should be removed; if it comes from a less reputable source, then that should be noted, but sanitizing an article to reflect only one viewpoint is unacceptable. Removing information shows as much of an agenda as adding it. In general, articles should reflect all of the available information and opinions, with clear notations of sources when possible.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:06, 24 January 2007 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 21:06, 24 January 2007
Clach
- This page will need a bit of work. Needs to become more factual and more like the Paire article. (Admin 13:06, 1 January 2007 (EST))
Looks good now.....
I don't think it should look and feel exactly like Paire's article......because I think our's should stand out a little bit!!
- For a fan site I'd definitely agree, you'd want to set yourself apart. Here, on the other hand, it's beneficial to standardize when possible and give pages the same feel. :) (Admin 16:54, 1 January 2007 (EST))
- And by the way, you've done a great job cleaning the article up, Gargyloveswolfy. :) (Admin 16:59, 1 January 2007 (EST))
The "de-gaying" issue
I will NOT tolerate people adding for their own personal agenda. --Gargyloveswolfy 15:34, 24 January 2007
- What do you believe was inappropriate about the material you removed? I checked it out and it seems like legitimate material concerning the change they made to the character. (Admin 16:00, 24 January 2007 (EST))
- I detracted from the point of the article.
- I think everyone needs to be careful to remember that this is a Wiki; by its nature, it's a collaboration. Nobody "owns" an article. Nobody should police an article for content they disagree with. Only information that is clearly and conclusively wrong should be removed; if it comes from a less reputable source, then that should be noted, but sanitizing an article to reflect only one viewpoint is unacceptable. Removing information shows as much of an agenda as adding it. In general, articles should reflect all of the available information and opinions, with clear notations of sources when possible.--Hardvice (talk) 16:06, 24 January 2007 (EST)