This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Maury Parkman

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 00:57, 23 May 2007 by imported>Pearse
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rename?

Okay, "Worse than the boogeyman" is, franky, silly. It woud be much more professional if it was something like "Man watching Molly" or "Molly's enemy" --Heroe!(talk) (contribs) 17:42, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

  • I agree. "Worse than the boogeyman" is ridiculous! It doesn't even convince the reader right away that the article is even about a person. "Man watching Molly" is MUCH better. -- Novajoe23 18:09, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
    • "Man watching Molly" makes the guy sound like a pedophile...--Ice Vision 18:21, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
      • "Man watching Molly" isn't accurate. She never said he was watching her, but that he could see her if she saw him. --Riddler 19:12, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
        • How about something simple, like "New Villain" or "Mysterious Bad Man"?--Sauron18 19:35, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
            • I think the current name is okay for now, but here's my suggestions: Molly's monster... or Monster (reflected clairvoyance).--MiamiVolts (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
                • Well, as long as we have sufficent redirects, because it took me a long time to find the article. The actual article could be something as simply as "He", or "Him", as long as it's referenced elsewhere and easy to find. --Sauron18 19:51, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
                  • There's also "Man who can see Molly" Heroe!(talk) (contribs) 19:53, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
                    • How about Sauron? ;-) In all seriousness, "Man Who Can See Molly" is the best suggestion. It's more specific than "him" and doesn't sound silly like the current title.--20:57, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

Image

I realize we haven't seen this guy yet. Would an image of Molly talking to Matt about him be appropriate for now? Or is the consensus to leave this without an image for now?--MiamiVolts (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2007 (EDT)