This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Reginald Stanley

From Heroes Wiki
Revision as of 20:01, 7 February 2010 by imported>Mc hammark (Description)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reame

Brian Estwick sent me a lot of information about his character, including the name that he gave him, Reginald Stanley. The name is never said or even hinted anywhere in any Heroes media. However, we've gotten character names from a variety of sources, many of which don't include Heroes media. In this case, I have no problem moving this page to "Reginald Stanley". Any objections? -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2010 (EST)

Description

In the notes section, is that description serious or just a joke on the writers part?--PJDEP - Need further explanation? 18:16, 28 January 2010 (EST)

  • I think it's just the thing actors do, give their characters a background. Given that the carnies probably won't be elaborated on, I'd probably believe that is his background. But his ability does sound similar. --mc_hammark 18:23, 28 January 2010 (EST)
    • I guess, it's just lines like "he's the godhead in human form" that throw me off....--PJDEP - Need further explanation? 18:31, 28 January 2010 (EST)
      • I have to admit, I had to read it a few times to understand it. I seems to me like he has above said ability, and understands when he should intervene in events, and when not. --mc_hammark 18:34, 28 January 2010 (EST)
        • The note should probably make it clearer that that background was unofficially created by the actor and is not really a "true" plot point.--Referos 18:36, 28 January 2010 (EST)
          • Gotcha. This is completely serious, and it was created by Brian Estwick (not the writers). -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2010 (EST)
            • It's a stupid background.--Piemanmoo 12:58, 6 February 2010 (EST)
              • You can't just say it's a stupid background, if anything it's an excellent and thought through background. --mc_hammark 13:13, 6 February 2010 (EST)
                • No, it's just stupid.--Piemanmoo 13:47, 7 February 2010 (EST)
                  • I'm not even going to bother. --mc_hammark 15:01, 7 February 2010 (EST)