Talk:The Company

Split history

Is there any real reason to have two history pages? I know it's long, but Hiro and Claire are long too.--Bob 04:43, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

• I don't mind having just the one page. I made it two only because it's *really* long. Feel free to change it back.--MiamiVolts (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Yeah, I'd say we do one page, long or not. (Besides, some of it can be trimmed anyway.) Then after Season One is over (aw, tonight...), we can split S1 histories off and start over for Season Two. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 07:05, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
    • Okay, even though one of the history pages is gone, it's still two pages: The Company and "The Company/history (season 1)," which I don't want to link because it should be deleted. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:20, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
      • It minus well be two pages (The Company and The Company/history (season 1)) now. Aren't we going to move all the season 1 histories anyway so we can add Season 2 come fall???--MiamiVolts (talk) 12:16, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
        • Even if we are going to, there should be a high-level summary of season one on this article (kind of what's currently in the About section of this article), linked to the history article--not just a bare link. And since we have until September to archive these, I think the split is a bit premature as yet. But if we're going to do it now, it should at least be done properly. We also need to be careful of person and perspective in the history section.--Hardvice (talk) 12:48, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

Original Heroes

Should we recognize the group that obviously used to work together? Clearly, at least Mr. Linderman, Mr. Petrelli, Angela Petrelli, Kaito Nakamura, and Charles Deveaux all used to work together as part of the hero-team that made efforts for good until something went wrong. It has been alluded to multiple times. They also all appear to have some type of connection to the combination of interrelated groups: The Company/The Linderman Group/The Deveaux Society.

• Yes, it has been alluded to a lot, but just becuase it's obvious doesn't mean it's confirmed. We should wait until we have some actual confimartion. --Hero!^(talk)_(contribs) 12:01, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
  • Well said. I'm anxious to find out more about it (luckily Volume Two is called Generations), but I'm not sure the original members will be a separate article. It really depends on how it's all presented. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:05, 1 September 2007 (EDT)
• I'd bet the mortgage the groups all originated from the same hero-team and post-incident, they all splintered, only to reconvene in a small way for the events driving our plot in the present.
• "Mastodon!"

"Pterodactyl!"

"Triceratops!"

"Saber-Toothed Tiger!"

"Tyrannosaurus!" this power rangers joke is deemed relavent yet my theory was erased twice? is this a joke?

- Charles, Angela, Kaito, Mr. Petrelli, Mr. Linderman

• I put your theory back in. It shouldn't have been removed, it looks like a valid theory to me pertaining to The Company even if it does combine some theories we have on other pages. (Admin 19:27, 5 October 2007 (EDT))
• However, it does need to be spell checked, linked, corrected for grammar, etc. And only specific citations to episodes and graphic novels belong in the Citations column (example: "When Claire cuts off her toe, it grows back. (Lizards)). Other than that, though, it looks perfectly OK.--Hardvice (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Rename?

So, there's this clip from the video game, this this shot of a book reading "Primatech Research", and the note about Bob that reads "runs Primatech Research". Should we rename this article to Primatech Research? I think it at least merits a note.--Bob (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2007 (EST)