Template talk:Nextepisode

Spoilers

Is this summary of Godsend too spoilerish? I don't really mind it personally, but having it on the front page might be a bit much. Maybe it just needs a quick spoiler warning? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2007 (EST)

Seeing as how it came from tvguide.com and is basically in the press, I wouldn't put the spoiler warning on it. We haven't had one before. ---- 00:02, 10 January 2007 (EST)

I know we haven't had one before, but just because it's in the press doesn't mean it's common knowledge. We just need to be mindful of people that want to avoid spoilers. 'Sides, it's still pretty up front and center, and a spoiler warning doesn't hurt. :) - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 07:35, 11 January 2007 (EST)

Well, is we took "new hero" and linked it to Claude, that would justify the spoiler warning. --Orne 08:31, 11 January 2007 (EST)

I raise the same concerns about the Main Page "Next on Heroes" box here. -- DTM 16:09, 18 January 2007 (EST)

.07%

Can we be sure this is the confirmed name of the next episode? Heroe 21:59, 10 March 2007 (EST)

• It was printed in Entertainment Weekly, but there's no harm in waiting until we hear something more official. BTW, IMDb is still calling it simply .07 (without the percent).... but they're about as reliable as NBC. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:57, 10 March 2007 (EST)

Screwy spacing

Well, I tried to the best of my knowledge to fix the spacing for this page. The height seems to be getting screwed up. Can somebody fix it please? Much obliged! — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 06:55, 22 March 2007 (EDT)

• It's still showing up the same for me. I know each browser is different, but on mine, there's unneeded space between "For spoilers about upcoming episodes, see" and "upcoming episodes or .07%" as though it were double-spaced or something. Hmmm. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 11:13, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
  • On mine, there's much less space with it in the same row than on a separate row. (With a separate row, you've got the table padding and spacing to deal with as well.) The problem with small text is that it doesn't affect line-height.--Hardvice (talk) 11:33, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
    • Thanks, it was the line-height style change I was seeking. It looks fine on mine, now ... I don't think it's messing anybody else's up, but if it does, let me know. Thanks, hv. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)
      • Looks unchanged on mine.--Hardvice (talk) 14:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)