This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Brian's office

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


In On the Lam, it looks and sounds to me that when he fled his office he returned to Vegas to "hide in plain sight". Note the placement of the freeway sign that reads "Las Vegas". As for the actual location, I want to say New York City because of the campaign posters that cling to the walls; but since I've no proof, I changed it to unknown.--MiamiVolts (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2008 (EDT)

  • It's not a point I want to belabor since there's no confirmation of it, but there's pretty strong evidence that Brian's office is in Vegas. When he's first hired, he goes to the Corinthian (in Vegas) to do "research", and then is shown immediately after in his office. He talks about Linderman like he lives in the same vicinity as him, and even says he doesn't want to end up at the bottom of Lake Mead, which is just next door to Vegas. When he leaves his office, they never show him creating his new identity, making new contacts, or even show where he goes--all that's solely in the narration. The panel that shows Brian driving to Vegas is when he decides to return "back home" and hide out in the open. To me, all signs point to Vegas. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
    • I think it's fine to leave it unknown with a note. When Brian worked at the Corinthian casino, he might have worked elsewhere's than the office used for the "logic bomb". I actually thought the "logic bomb" office was in NYC since there were all those campaign paraphernalia on the walls and desk. Also, the "logic bomb" office could just as easily be outside of Vegas in a nearby city, where Linderman could also have a home. I'm sure Brian would be willing to make the commute since Linderman was paying him rather well.--MiamiVolts (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
      • I think that's taking some pretty winding roads to prove something, but I said I'm not going to belabor the point. However, the note definitely needs to be changed. "When Brian's role in Linderman's plot to control Nathan's campaign" is incomplete. But more importantly, saying that Brian fled his office and returned to Vegas doesn't give the whole story, since we really don't know where he went in between. It's better just to say that the location is unknown and leave it at that. And in that case, the infobox already lists that the location is unknown, so no note is needed. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
        • I fixed the grammar. Since we don't know whether Brian went anywhere in between, I left that part out. If you'd rather just remove the note, I guess that's okay.--MiamiVolts (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2008 (EDT)
          • Yeah, let's. The point of the note is to say that the location is unknown, and the rest is unnecessary. The infobox already says that the location is unknown, and there's really no point in drawing attention to it. Good change on the grammar, though. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2008 (EDT)