This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Theory talk:Mohinder the lizard

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deletion

No reasonable theory about the lizard. Can we delete it? Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 13:00, 14 March 2009 (EDT)

  • Agreed, no good justification for any of the theories. --Ross R. Smith 13:06, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
  • The theory is too far fetched, yes, but it brought a smile to my face, so I'm biased towards keeping it =) --Balke 13:13, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
  • Aww, come on, it's all in good fun.Zaedon 14:34, 14 March 2009 (EDT)
  • We still have a waffles theory page. Who are you to say that those theories are more reasonable than these? I say we keep it. --Mohinder613 (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
    • The only reason I haven't nominated Waffle theories and Mr. Muggles theories for deletion is the backlash I'd get from others, I think those are a waste of space and resources. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 19:57, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
      • By that reasoning, if there is backlash when you suggest deleting this theory, would you consider not deleting it? Hehe, I'm kidding, obviously. --Balkce 20:10, 24 March 2009 (EDT)
        • I managed to get insane drug dealer and Harry Fletcher insane theories, I can get some backlash, but Mr. Muggles and Waffles sized backlash? I want to keep my reputation. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 20:35, 24 March 2009 (EDT)

Personally, I find the 'Mohinder from the future' theory to be quite reasonable. Besides, shouldn't all pages have a theories page for people to discuss things? Lavi 23:17, 14 July 2009 (EDT)

  • Delete it. No sense, no lulz, no necessity. -- Altes 03:08, 15 July 2009 (EDT)
    • The 'Mohinder from the future' theory has still not been ruled out.
      • Fixed, amigo. -- Altes 04:22, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
        • Sorry, but your arguements have been countered. Besides, I have two things to point out. A) This page is frequently updated, and B) isn't the point to a theory that it doesn't have to make sense? There are people who firmly believe that Elvis is alive, or that Lizard people secretely rule the earth (No, I'm not kidding.) and they will gladly offer you what they believe is cold hard proof. I'm sure evensome of the people at the Mr.Muggles page believe SOME of the crap they're spouting. Lavi 10:01, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
          • Sorry, but the new arguments have been countered by me :-P but the first and the second theories are stupid, so if you prefer theories that make sense, delete the two. As for the "Future Mohinder" theory - okay, let's debate. And if you have proofs for it like the people who believe Elvis is alive - go on, I'd wish to see what you have to offer. -- Altes 10:21, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
            • I didn't say I had facts. I said people in general. My facts are severely limited as I missed the entire third season due to lack of television. But I will do my best. I should point out that I personally believe that all theory pages should be left alone. I think every page needs a place for fans to speculate.
              • Sorry to crash the party, but theories have to make sense, that's why there are no more random drug dealer and Harry Fletcher theories around. Therioes have to have some credibility. I don't know where you got the idea that this page is frequently updated, the last edit before today was in March. No such thing as "the point to a theory that it doesn't have to make sense". Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 14:58, 16 July 2009 (EDT)
                • Sorry, new to the wiki. And I should have phrased that better: A theory needs some credibility. However, though it has since been disproved, some people did manage to come up with several rreasons why Mohinder-lizard could be the real Mohinder. There's no harm in leaving the page up for people to view. That's the only point I'm trying to make. Lavi 15:51, 16 July 2009 (EDT)