This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Electric manipulation: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Content deleted Content added
imported>MishBaker
m PNB fix
imported>Realistic
 
(358 intermediate revisions by 68 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk:Electric manipulation/top}}
{{power names|1|eos=The power has been called "lightning" numerous times, most notably in ''[[Petrified Lightning]]'' and ''[[Four Months Ago...]].''}}
{{power names|2|eos=This ability has been explicitly and expertly named by [[Elle]]'s [[Assignment Tracker]] profile}}
== Title photo ==
__TOC__
I must say, good choice for the title photo. I was torn between something like this and electric kiss.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 00:36, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*It's one of my favorite power photos--I love the expression on Elle's face. In fact, I'm seriously considering swapping it for [[:Image:Powers dl nikis cell.jpg]] (in templates like [[Template:Portalnav|this]]) to represent [[powers]] in general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:39, 14 November 2007 (EST)


==Lightning?==
==Highly Confused==
Come on, you have to be kidding me. Lightning?!?! Is that the best name you all can create? Exactly what was wrong with Electromagnestism?--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 13:43, 14 November 2007 (EST)
* The writers said it didn't apply to Elle's power in a Behind the Eclipse.--[[User:MiamiVolts|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts|talk]]) 13:49, 14 November 2007 (EST)
**But still everyone here can come up with a better name than "Lightning".--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 13:51, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*** It's not a matter of "coming up" with anything. Lightning has been used repeatedly in canonical and near canonical sources to refer to the ability. Until Mohinder decides to give it another name, it's the term that has to be used. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 14:36, 14 November 2007 (EST))
**** Plus they never explicitly stated that electrokinesis or anything else was the proper name for it, they just prefered it when given the choice between it or electromagnetism. All other powers have been given proper names either in the show or by the show's staff. A good example is that originally Peter's power was just called power mimicry before getting the word empath added. --[[User:PeterDawson|PeterDawson]] 14:54, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*****I think Lightning is the best name for it, especially in light of [[Four Months Ago...]]. Clearly (to me, anyway), Elle releases lightning bolts from her fingers (and mouth).--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 14:56, 14 November 2007 (EST)
******If its not a matter of "coming up" with a name then where the hell did you get the name Electromagnetism? I don't recall it being called that in the graphic novel or on screen.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 21:44, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*******We came up with that name because no name was given for the power. When a name is given, we use it. When no name is given, we consult other sources. When no other sources give it, we generally name it ourselves. See [[Help:Naming conventions#Power Names]] for a full breakdown on the process. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:51, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*Look, what I want to point out is the only difference between the Agent using this power and Elle using it is that the Agent uses it to levitate some and Elle doesn't. Other than that, the powers are THE SAME. Your descriptions for the powers on the pages are simular there for making the powers simular. I'm trying to say is that you should make some distinction between them or IMO combine them back and call the power "Electricity Manipulation".--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 22:04, 14 November 2007 (EST)
**I'm not educated in the powers of Elle, but the production of lightning has to do with the separation of extremely different charges of atoms or particles within the air. Meaning that Elle MUST have control over the polarization of those particles. Thus, an appropriate name could be Electric Manipulation. I agree with The Empath in such that if two different articles have the same discription or definition, that is terms for merging the two articles. Repetition is not good. Electromagnetism refers to controlling the polariztion of particles so that they attract to each other. This makes the names of the abilities the same...but Electromagnetism gives a very specific sense of her ability and does not capture it as a whole.--[[User:Linuxlover101|Free Willy]] 22:15, 14 November 2007 (EST)
**The ability to levitate or not is a pretty big difference. Other abilities are similar (Linderman's and Claire's) but not the same. The distinction we've made is separating the powers since they're not the same. [[Joe Pokaski]] and [[Aron Coleite]] have said as much. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:35, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*** Its Electrical Manipulation or Electrokinesis... Look at any comic book website. Really, if you Look at Johnny Ohm from Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the Imperfects (the videogame) he has this exact power we are talking about and its just one ability. Put it in one category or change one of the definitions so at least they are not the same. --[[User:.Vault|.Vault]] 22:43, 14 November 2007 (EST)
****The Lightning page has the "Ability to" as to generate electrical energy. One can create electrical energy without creating/causing lightning! The elctromagnetism page says this: Manipulate and/or generate electrostatic energy. These are the same. This either needs to be changed to make a distinction between the two or I vote to remerge the articles.--[[User:Linuxlover101|Free Willy]] 22:48, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*****I second that. They are clearly the same abilities, I don't know why you all don't see that.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 22:49, 14 November 2007 (EST)
***** See [[User:Heroe/electromagnetically-based abilities]] for a compare-and-contrast of this ability and electromagnetism. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 22:59, 14 November 2007 (EST)
******They are not the same ability. I tend to take the writers' words above my own ideas, the consensus of other fans, and certainly over comic books which exist in a different world than ''Heroes''. To see what the writers have to say about it (specifically that say it's not the same power), see [http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12227 here]. For a discussion on the split, see [[Talk:Electromagnetism#Lightning|here]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:56, 14 November 2007 (EST)
****** Ignoring for a moment the fact that the writers stated that Elle's power doesn't include magnetism, if they were indeed the same power then the term that '''must''' be used for both has to be lightning. That term has been used canonically to describe Elle's (and Peter's) power. There is no other option for the name of that power in that instance. The reason for the split was because the term lightning didn't seem to best describe what the agent was exhibiting since he also levitated (plus the writers explicitly said her power didn't involve electromagnetism). If it were the same power Elle and Peter will be able to use the power of lightning to levitate, but to make that claim seemed more speculative (since it's not yet been observed) so the powers were split just to play it safe. When in doubt and when there is no canonical reference that states otherwise it is safer to split powers into two articles rather than claim that they're the same exact power. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 23:04, 14 November 2007 (EST))
*Dude here is what it says: ''Peter continues, On a small side note, are Elle's powers just electricity or is it electro-magnetism? A guy who appeared in the comics had electro-magnetism, so I'm just curious if it's the exact same power or just good old electrokinesis. Good old electrokinesis. She's no Magneto. More Living Lightning. Yes. We said Living Lightning''. Acording to him, the power is "Good old electrokinesis". You've proven that its not Electromagnetism, I rest my case. Then lets call this article Electrokinesis. It's got a source and all so why not? :-) --[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 23:10, 14 November 2007 (EST)
** There's a pretty lengthy [[Talk:Electromagnetism#Split?|discussion]], [[Talk:Electromagnetism#To Summarize the Above|summary]], and [[Talk:Electromagnetism#Then let's get the vote down.|vote]] on the subject of calling the power "electrokinesis". Personally, I feel the writers were just repeating the term given to them rather than actually calling the power by that name. But Elle's and the agent's powers are still not necessarily the same powers. They might be different iterations of the same power, or they might be two different powers altogether. Elle does not levitate like the agent does, and that's a pretty big difference. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:29, 14 November 2007 (EST)
** The only problem I have is that the descriptions must be changed between the two pages, otherwise it seems redundant. Right now the descriptions are EXACTLY the same word for word. Someone who is more knowledgable about why you guys split them in the first place should change one of them. [[User:Random guy|Random guy]] 23:15, 14 November 2007 (EST)
***This is also a concern of mine. The descriptions need to be changed in order to discren between the two.--[[User:Linuxlover101|Free Willy]] 23:17, 14 November 2007 (EST)
****I don't mind fixing the descriptions, but it seems silly to me to change the infobox description (which is perfectly fine) when the lead text is much more descriptive and specific. I wouldn't mind a tweak, though. However, the more we add levitation to [[electromagnetism]], the more I want to remove the [[teenage patient]] and call his power something different altogether. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:24, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*****I am sorry, I wasn't specific about the description. What I meant was that the "Limits" section both read "Users of this power can generate electrical arcs between themselves and other people or objects within a range of at least a few meters. The amount of current that such arcs can carry is not known. Users of the power are not harmed by electrical currents that they create themselves; it is not clear whether this power gives resistance to electrical current from other sources." on both pages. I think that one of these descriptions should be changed. [[User:Random guy|Random guy]] 12:19, 15 November 2007 (EST)
*****If thats true then move him to Electrokinesis. Done and done.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 23:34, 14 November 2007 (EST)
****** We have a name from the writers for his power, too. [[Mark Sable]] called it "electrical absorption".--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:51, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*Well, I created the article Electrokinesis but it was deleted...Would you like to vote on changing it to Electrokinesis?--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 23:53, 14 November 2007 (EST)
** Changing what to electrokinesis?--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:54, 14 November 2007 (EST)
***This article to Electrokinesis.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 23:56, 14 November 2007 (EST)
**** No. That ship has sailed. "Lightning" is used in canon sources. "Electrokinesis" was repeated in an interview. Only another canon source name can replace it at this point. See [[Help:Naming conventions]].--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:00, 15 November 2007 (EST)
*****So then what was stated [http://www.comicbookresources.com/news/newsitem.cgi?id=12227 here] doesn't have anything to do with the Heroes cannon?--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 00:05, 15 November 2007 (EST)
****** Sure it does. It's a secondary source. Now, assuming for a moment that the writers agreed that that's the name, and that they weren't merely repeating what was said in the question, then the episodes and the graphic novels still win out over an interview. See [[Help:Sources]]. However, I personally don't believe that they stated that was the name; I think they merely repeated it the way it was phrased in the question for clarity.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:13, 15 November 2007 (EST)
*******Ok then I must not be understanding somthing here. You all are about "sources, sources, sources" in order to make a right change. I gave one and yet somehow its not creditable enough? Thats bull and you know it.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 00:21, 15 November 2007 (EST)
******** Please read [[Help:Sources]] yet again. Not all sources are the same. Canon sources (episodes, graphic novels) trump secondary sources.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:22, 15 November 2007 (EST)
*********Okay, Seriously. They are the same ability, people are just learning to use them at different rates. How are we supposed to know Elle can't levitate? Plus Elle can absorb Electricity as well cause when she told Peter her life story she told him she knocked out power to 8 counties. HOW ELSE DO YOU DO THAT WITHOUT ABSORBING ELECTRICITY? They are all the same ability. Electrokinesis, or the MANIPULATION (which is what they seem to be doing) of electricity. I say we just make an Electrokinesis page and list off the individual notes for each character so far... since thats all we can really do. Cause if we do this we should split up Pyrokinesis as well.... cause Meredith has only shown us she can create it, not throw it. But we shouldn't do that cause we know its the same ability. Like Electrokinesis.--[[User:.Vault|.Vault]] 23:31, 15 November 2007 (EST)
********** Even if we combined the powers again, we'd still be stuck calling them all "lightning", the name used in a canon source, not "electrokinesis", a name which was possibly used in a secondary source, so it's a moot point. However, at this stage of the game it's highly speculative to say that any of the three abilities is the same. All three involve electricity, but each includes elements the others do not. It's safer to list them separately, which leaves open the possibility that they're different manifestations of the same power, rather then listing them together, which declares that to be the case.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 15 November 2007 (EST)
*********** Also, combining them seems to go directly against what Joe and Aron told us, which is that Elle's power does not include any magnetism, and is not same as the agent's power. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:42, 16 November 2007 (EST)
************ Also, if people are dead set on recombining them, here's another reason we're still stuck with "lightning": Peter calls the agent's power "lightning" in ''Walls, Part 2''. Now, since we have a secondary source claim that they're two separate powers, I think it's fine to separate them, assume Peter just didn't understand all aspects of the power in ''Walls'', and go from there. But if they are recombined, all sources point to lightning.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 13:10, 16 November 2007 (EST)


I know some people are going to sigh at this but as the title says I'm very confused for several reasons:
==A true analogy==
Ok lightning is to electromagnetism as Fire is to pyrokinesis. We might as well called Meredith's power "fire". Lighting is just... It doesn't explain the power at all. Does Elle eat lightning? Does she fart lightning? If anything we should say that she "manipulates" it. Lightning is very plain. And it is used in canonical sources but I still think we should add manipulation. I'm going to have to agree with THe Empath. [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 23:44, 14 November 2007 (EST)
*Thank you Jason.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 23:46, 14 November 2007 (EST)
* "Lightning" is the name used consistently in the show, in the graphic novels, and in the episode commentaries. We're stuck with it.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:51, 14 November 2007 (EST)
* No offense. but define constantly? In the show they never say that D.L. phases through walls. They say he walks through walls. Then I'll have to vote on walkthroughwallskinesis. Not to be rude or anything but I'm just trying to interpret back to you the logic that your saying. Also, they Haitian's powers are described as a "negation". The name lightning. I'm imagining the pretty yellow line in the sky... [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 23:55, 14 November 2007 (EST)
** They have indeed called D.L.'s power "phasing". Elle has referred to her power as "lightning". Peter tried yelling "lightning" to get it to work. They call it "lightning" several times in a graphic novel called, oddly enough, "[[Petrified Lightning]]". Tim Kring called it "lightning" in the episode commentary. So did Greg Beeman. So did Milo Ventimiglia.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 23:58, 14 November 2007 (EST)
***<br>
"''D.L. can phase inside the buildings. Candice's illusion can distract the guards.''"
:- Future Hiro (to Ando) (''[[Five Years Gone]]'')


1) You've listed Elle's power as Electric Manipulation. Shouldn't this be Electrokinesis (which means creating and conrtollling electricity (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychokinesis#Umbrella_term for an example) just like with Cryo, psycho, tele and pyrokinesis (amongst others).
* "Electrokinesis", as far as I understand, is a made up term, and is not a real term like "telekinesis" or "pyrokinesis". However, I'm not a language expert, so I can't be positive. Although, I what I am positive about is that Elle's [[Assignment Tracker 2.0]] explicitly lists her ability as "electric manipulation", so that's what we use. Our job here is to archive the information that's given to us, not to figure out something that sounds better or fits better. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:01, 31 May 2009 (EDT)


2) In relation to point 1, some people supported the idea of calling it lightning and cite quotes from the show as proof. I've read some of those quotes. Lightning is a noun, it refers to the product of Electric Manipulation/Electrokinesis. That would be like calling pyrokinesis "Fire".
"''Why did you take that bullet? You could've let it phase right through you.''"
:- Niki (to D.L.) (''[[How to Stop an Exploding Man]]'')
--[[User:Ice Vision|Ice Vision]] 00:06, 15 November 2007 (EST)


3) Surely, if Electric Manipulation is to be the name for this power then Electrokinesis shoudl redirect here rather than to the [[Electric (disambig)]]
*What's wrong with simple names? After all, we have [[flight]] and [[persuasion]]. We're not going to change those anytime soon. --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 00:08, 15 November 2007 (EST)
** I agree with you. I like simple names, like lightning. Complicated names are too... complicated.--[[User:Ice Vision|Ice Vision]] 00:09, 15 November 2007 (EST)
***The only reason there is nothing wrong with flight or persuasion is because those are the correct terms for the powers used in other sources (comics).--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 00:12, 15 November 2007 (EST)
**** No. The reason those are the correct names is that, in the case of flight, it's a name used in a canon source, and in the case of persuasion, it's a name used in interviews. Other comics come quite far down the list.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:15, 15 November 2007 (EST)
***** Let me also include that in the case of persuasion there was never a more authoritative (as explained in [[Help:Sources]]) name provided which is why the interview term was sufficient in this instance. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 00:18, 15 November 2007 (EST))
*Complicated? Adding one word Lightning manipulation is hardly complicated. Electronic Data Transception is complicated. Okay, I must sleep, this feels like the Monkey Scopes Trial. hahaha. But I just think a word like control or manipulation could better help people understand the power. [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 00:18, 15 November 2007 (EST)
** I just hope Mohinder examines Elle soon and gives us a better name for her ability like he did for [[Monica]]. :) ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 00:20, 15 November 2007 (EST))
***Yes that would be extremely helpful. [[User:Jason Garrick|Jason Garrick]] 00:21, 15 November 2007 (EST)
** Assuming for a moment that we were going to take a canon source name and mess with it, which we aren't, "lightning control" or "lightning manipulation" both sound incorrect. They sound like she's doing something to lightning which already exists. She isn't--she's producing or generating lightning. If I have the superpower to make cats appear, that's not covered by "cat manipulation" or "cat control". As anyone who has ever spent time around cats can attest, there's a big difference between getting a cat and controlling a cat.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:21, 15 November 2007 (EST)
***Then why not like my friend Will suggested, change the article to somthing that does make since like Electric Manipulation. I as well must sleep.--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 00:25, 15 November 2007 (EST)
**** We don't change from a name given in a canon source to anything but another name given in a canon source. Not now, not ever.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:26, 15 November 2007 (EST)


4) Shouldn't electrical absortion come under Electric manipulation since you're basically manipulating electricity?
==[[Help:Naming conventions|Naming conventions]] analysis==
Since nobody seems to want to read the naming conventions and understand why this change was made, let's walk through it:
# '''FIRST''', names from episodes. '''RESULT''': Lightning <-- In truth, we stop here
# '''SECOND''', and ONLY IF no names from episodes, names from ''Heroes'' graphic novels. '''RESULT''': Lightning
# '''THIRD''', and ONLY IF no names from graphic novels, secondary sources. '''RESULTS''': Electrokinesis from BTE (maybe), Lightning from episode commentaries
# '''FOURTH''', and ONLY IF no names from secondary sources, descriptive names. THIS INCLUDES ANY NAME YOU WANT TO MAKE UP THAT HASN'T BEEN AIRED OR PRINTED SOMEWHERE
# '''FIFTH''', and ONLY IF no descriptive name is possible, "So-and-so's power".


5) Lastly, why are interviews with writers considered less canonical than what's in the episodes, I'd think it would be the other way around. -- [[User:Wiccid|Wiccid]] 19:15, 31 May 2009 (EDT)
Now, we stop here at the very first step. If we'd continued to the second step, it would ''still'' be "lightning". If we had continued to the third step, it would probably ''still'' be lightning because "lightning" is used more than the only other name in secondary sources, "electrokinesis". We can't even consider making up a name because we already have names to choose from. Hope that helps and doesn't come across as rude; I really do want everybody to understand ''how'' and ''why'' the change was made. As always, please see [[Help:Naming conventions]] and [[Help:Sources]] for more on how we choose names and which sources trump which other sources.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:36, 15 November 2007 (EST)
* Our goal here is not to archive what writers say, but to record what is said in the world of ''Heroes''. In fact, interviews with writers are not [[canon]]ical at all. They are good secondary and supplementary information, but episodes will always trump what a writer says in an interview, article, commentary, or elsewhere. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:01, 31 May 2009 (EDT)
*Ok then that creates an even bigger problem with this site. List some sources for the power names Empathic mimicry, Induced radioactivity, Water mimicry, Mental manipulation, and Intuitive aptitude. Don't you dare, tell me that your basing the names based on quote like Claude calling Peter an empath (when clearly Empathy has NOTHING to do with mimicry of powers).--[[User:Dylankidwell|The Empath]] 00:40, 15 November 2007 (EST)
** Induced radioactivity comes from the Genesis Files, a canon source (step #1). We're stuck with it. Water mimicry is descriptive (step #4), but based on the text in the novel--he says he can mimic the density of water, and also that he can turn his body into liquid. Empathic mimicry is also descriptive, though based (as you guessed) in part on Claude's statement. Mental manipulation is descriptive; although the individual aspects of his power have been mentioned, no name has ever been given which covers both negating powers and erasing memories. Intuitive aptitude is descriptive; the power has never even been officially acknowledged. In every case you mention, the highest-ranking option has been used. There are no canon, near-canon, or secondary source names for mental manipulation, intuitive aptitude, empathic mimicry, or water mimicry. There is a canon source name for induced radioactivity. There's ''nothing wrong'' with descriptive names without sources--they just shouldn't be used when a better source exists. I hope that illustrates the naming conventions in operation.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 00:50, 15 November 2007 (EST)
***I think it would be good, as a point of procedure, to use the naming conventions table much like a new episode checklist at the start of naming a power. That will resolve alot of the back and forth. Combined with the realization that this is a documentary not a creation. So even though our "Spontaneous Discharge of Electromagnetic Force" is more specific than "Lightning" that's too bad because that's what the creators called it, so that's what we document.--<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 13:38, 16 November 2007 (EST)
****That's a great idea. Hardvice, do you have any objections to putting the simplified chart you made (the one at [[User:Admin/Power name origination]]) into a template? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 13:43, 16 November 2007 (EST)
***** I was thinking something like <br>
<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="1">
<tr><td>Source</td><td>Cite</td></tr>
<tr><td>1st In Show</td><td>Yes/No (Where)</td></tr>
<tr><td>2nd In Novel</td><td>Yes/No (Where)</td></tr>
<tr><td>3rd In Interview</td><td>Yes/No (Where)</td></tr>
<tr><td>4th In some other material</td><td>Yes/No (Where)</td></tr>
<tr><td>5th We just make this up</td><td>Yes/No (Where)</td></tr>
</table>
Sort of like an algorythm or flow-chart. If NO then goto #2, if YES then WHERE. That kinda thing. --<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 13:54, 16 November 2007 (EST)


== Sylar's immunity to tazers ==
==Peter's Citations and other inconsistencies now created==
This two-page electric-split is very confusing. Take Peter for example. Present Peter is listed with this page. However, Future Peter is listed on the other electric page. However, after re-reading Walls 1 & 2, I can't find any characteristics that Future-Peter exhibited with electricty in Walls that differs from the exhibitions Present-Peter has made with electricity. Peter, whether future or present, simply casts electricity/lightning/charged particles, whatever...from his body at other people.


I think this ability or regeneration is why Sylar is immune to tazers. He wasn't immune before, but it wasn't really shown if he became immune after getting regeneration or this because his only real on-screen tazerings were in Fugitives. I think having this ability makes him immune to electricty, like tazers.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18|WarGrowlmon18]] 14:24, 29 September 2009 (EDT)
Yet, Peter is split across two different power pages, as if Peter has manifested different electric characteristics and different electric abilities. But Future-Peter and Present-Peter have manifested the same electric characteristics. Peter shouldn't be split across two different power pages, if he himself, hasn't exhibited two different characteristics of two different powers. Have two different pages if you must here....but both Peter's should be on one or the other, and not split across both. It seems to me that the desire to split the power is strong; but the clarity of distinction between the characteristics of the powers and who displays them is weak.
*Immediately after gaining claires ability, he is walking down the street and gets tazed without effect. RCR is the source of his immunity.


== Gloves ==
From my observations, there are three fundamental electric power characteristics that have been displayed.
1) Emitting Electrical Flows
2) Absorbing Electricity
3) Levitation via Electrical Control


Is it possible to use this ability, or any of the heat abilities, or freezing, if someone had gloves on?--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 16:38, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
Future-Peter and Present-Peter have only displayed #1.
*Gloves were used to subdue Tracy, so I think that if they were of special materials, they could be used to restrain the use of such abilities, as long as the evolved human tries to use it via their hands. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 16:56, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
The Hospital Patient has only displayed #2.
**But remember that tracy was still able to shatter out of the gloves eventually. And I'd say, based on a lot of demonstrations, that electric manipulation isn't reliant on the hands.[[User:Gamerelite1|Gamerelite1]] 14:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
Elle has only displayed #1, but has claimed to do #2 (in regards to the town).
***Only eventually, and she also had to build it up. [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 14:42, 12 November 2009 (EST)
The Moab Agent has only displayed #1 and is the only one to display #3.
****So, with gloves you would by at a clothing store, would someone still be able to fire lightning with them on, without burning their gloves?--{{User:Catalyst/sig}} 17:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
*****Depending on the glove... [[User:Intuitive Empath|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath|Contributions]] 17:15, 12 November 2009 (EST)
==Why is this not "Electricity Manipulation?==


From what I understand, "Electric manipulation" is manipulation using electricity, which is not what the power is. Electricity Manipulation is more politically-correct. The ability allows its user to manipulate(and also generate) electricity. I guess this has been discussed in the archives but I didn't read it (too long, many posts are pointless). Can anyone explain the reason for naming is as such?--[[User:Realistic|Realistic]] 08:31, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
So it's an intermingled mess; and not a clearly 1 and 2 split.
*If you ever want to know where ability names come from, just read the blue box in the top right hand corner of the talk page. It is noted explicitly in the assignment tracker as electric manipulation, so that's what we use. --[[User:Mc hammark|mc_hammark]] 08:35, 18 April 2010 (EDT)

*Oh... okay, thanks. I totally forgot about the AT--[[User:Realistic|Realistic]] 08:39, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
* Peter only Emits electrical flows, but doesn't absorb or levitate via electricity.
* Elle emits electrical flows and claims to absorb electricity, but doesn't levitate.
* Hospital Patient only absorbs electricity, but doesn't emit electrical flows nor levitate.
* Moab Agent emits and levitates, but doesn't absorb electricity.

The characteristics of the electrical powers displayed just doesn't fit cleanly into '2' categories. There are really 3 categories.

Leaving them combined as one category, seems to avoid the confusion of characteristics that don't fit by simply allowing one page to show all the variations....but its biggest downfall is an acceptible name....and noone seems to agree on one over-all umbrella name describing the power of 'electrical/lightning power'.

Spliting them into two categories better suits the naming convention concerns, but it creates two categories that don't accurately fit with the 3-phased characteristics that have been shown.

My biggest fear, is that with so much dissent and impassioned concern over this name-split....what precedence is going to befall us in the future when previously static powers start introduce new characteristics or variations...and we end up with 15 or 20 multi-split power pages that fundamentally are only describing 3 or 4 root powers?

Have we really gone beyond the point of return, that we can't have one page for 'Electrical/Lightning' that umbrellas all the 4 people that have manifested various aspects and characteristics of that power, so that it is not confusion, and easy to keep up with? If we have a new character next week who can stick his finger in a light-socket, and then make a lightning wall around his body, would that then merit another split-off page? If another character shows up after that, and can pull lightning out of clouds, and use it to aluminate bulbs or weld; then does that variation merit yet another spin-off page?

I just can't see why, (other than lack of a concensus name), that one page dedicated to people with 'electrical/lightning' abilities can't be the best approach for now. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer|talk]]) 11/16/2007 15:12 (EST)</small>
*The patient in Blackout actually does emit electrical charges. That's how he knocks out the Company Man.--<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 15:42, 16 November 2007 (EST)
**Also, I doubt the Heroes TV Show and Graphic Novels will ever have 250 characters with electrically based powers. I think it's fairly safe to take 3 seemingly seperate powers and list them as such until such a point as they are shown to be the same or similar enough to be listed together.--<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 16:25, 16 November 2007 (EST)

* The reason for the split on Peter is simple. Regardless of what abilities he displayed, Future Peter got his power from the agent, and thus has duped the agent's power, whatever it is--he acknowledges that it's a new power for him, so presumably Future Peter never met Elle. Present-day Peter got his power from Elle. That's all there is to it, really.<br>As for combining the people who actually possess the power (setting aside people who have duplicated it), it's speculative to say they have the same power because, in the case of two of them, we have canon or secondary source names that fit well with the fact that they are capable of very different things. Splitting powers based on how we observe them isn't saying that they are definitely separate powers, it's merely saying that they have different observed effects. However, combining them on one page under one name ''is'' saying that they are definitely the same power. That's speculation. We can't just assume that everyone with an electrical power which manifests differently has the same power any more than we could assume that Micah and Hana, who can both talk to machines, have the same power.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:51, 16 November 2007 (EST)
* Also, it's overstating Elle's claim to say that she claims she can absorb electricity. She claimed she caused a power outage; she didn't say how, or even that it was with her powers. It could have resulted from an overload (yes, that requires some suspension of disbelief) or she could have just knocked over an electrical pole on a tractor.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:53, 16 November 2007 (EST)

* And I couldn't agree with you more that there are three categories (really three powers). That's why we're trying to split electromagnetism again, so we will have three articles.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 16:55, 16 November 2007 (EST)
**Well said. I agree that separating the people doesn't mean they definitely have different powers. It's kind like how [[Austin]] and [[Linderman]] were separate articles for quite some time--they're not separate people, we just hadn't received enough information at the time to say they were the same person. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:42, 16 November 2007 (EST)

==Ironically==
If you check out Wikipedia's [[wikipedia:Heroes (TV series)|Heroes Page]] they call [[Elle]]'s power 'Electrical Manipulation'. Guess they don't follow the 6 step system. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 06:59, 17 November 2007 (EST)
*See. If they did, they could be right too.--<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 09:46, 17 November 2007 (EST)
* Wikipedia is a great resource, but they're not always right. But then again, neither are we, so I guess all's fair. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 11:29, 17 November 2007 (EST)
**Watch your tongue! We are '''ALWAYS''' right! And yes Wikipedia is an awesome resource, I spend hours on that site just reading. ;) --<strong>[[User:MishBaker|Mish]]</strong>([[User Talk:MishBaker|Talk]]) 11:36, 17 November 2007 (EST)

Latest revision as of 12:39, 18 April 2010

Ability Naming Conventions
The following sources are used for determining evolved human ability names, in order:
1. Canon Sources Episodes
Webisodes,
Graphic Novels,
iStories,
Heroes Evolutions
3. Secondary Sources Episode commentary,
Interviews,
Heroes: Survival
4. Common names for abilities Names from other works
5. Descriptions of abilities Descriptions
6. Possessor's name If no non-speculative
description is possible
Note: The highlighted row represents the level of the source used to determine electric manipulation's name.
Source/Explanation
This ability has been explicitly and expertly named by Elle's Assignment Tracker profile.

Highly Confused

I know some people are going to sigh at this but as the title says I'm very confused for several reasons:

1) You've listed Elle's power as Electric Manipulation. Shouldn't this be Electrokinesis (which means creating and conrtollling electricity (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychokinesis#Umbrella_term for an example) just like with Cryo, psycho, tele and pyrokinesis (amongst others).

  • "Electrokinesis", as far as I understand, is a made up term, and is not a real term like "telekinesis" or "pyrokinesis". However, I'm not a language expert, so I can't be positive. Although, I what I am positive about is that Elle's Assignment Tracker 2.0 explicitly lists her ability as "electric manipulation", so that's what we use. Our job here is to archive the information that's given to us, not to figure out something that sounds better or fits better. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

2) In relation to point 1, some people supported the idea of calling it lightning and cite quotes from the show as proof. I've read some of those quotes. Lightning is a noun, it refers to the product of Electric Manipulation/Electrokinesis. That would be like calling pyrokinesis "Fire".

3) Surely, if Electric Manipulation is to be the name for this power then Electrokinesis shoudl redirect here rather than to the Electric (disambig)

4) Shouldn't electrical absortion come under Electric manipulation since you're basically manipulating electricity?

5) Lastly, why are interviews with writers considered less canonical than what's in the episodes, I'd think it would be the other way around. -- Wiccid 19:15, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

  • Our goal here is not to archive what writers say, but to record what is said in the world of Heroes. In fact, interviews with writers are not canonical at all. They are good secondary and supplementary information, but episodes will always trump what a writer says in an interview, article, commentary, or elsewhere. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2009 (EDT)

Sylar's immunity to tazers

I think this ability or regeneration is why Sylar is immune to tazers. He wasn't immune before, but it wasn't really shown if he became immune after getting regeneration or this because his only real on-screen tazerings were in Fugitives. I think having this ability makes him immune to electricty, like tazers.--WarGrowlmon18 14:24, 29 September 2009 (EDT)

  • Immediately after gaining claires ability, he is walking down the street and gets tazed without effect. RCR is the source of his immunity.

Gloves

Is it possible to use this ability, or any of the heat abilities, or freezing, if someone had gloves on?--Catalyst · Talk · HL 16:38, 25 October 2009 (EDT)

  • Gloves were used to subdue Tracy, so I think that if they were of special materials, they could be used to restrain the use of such abilities, as long as the evolved human tries to use it via their hands. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 16:56, 25 October 2009 (EDT)
    • But remember that tracy was still able to shatter out of the gloves eventually. And I'd say, based on a lot of demonstrations, that electric manipulation isn't reliant on the hands.Gamerelite1 14:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)
      • Only eventually, and she also had to build it up. Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 14:42, 12 November 2009 (EST)
        • So, with gloves you would by at a clothing store, would someone still be able to fire lightning with them on, without burning their gloves?--Catalyst · Talk · HL 17:07, 12 November 2009 (EST)

Why is this not "Electricity Manipulation?

From what I understand, "Electric manipulation" is manipulation using electricity, which is not what the power is. Electricity Manipulation is more politically-correct. The ability allows its user to manipulate(and also generate) electricity. I guess this has been discussed in the archives but I didn't read it (too long, many posts are pointless). Can anyone explain the reason for naming is as such?--Realistic 08:31, 18 April 2010 (EDT)

  • If you ever want to know where ability names come from, just read the blue box in the top right hand corner of the talk page. It is noted explicitly in the assignment tracker as electric manipulation, so that's what we use. --mc_hammark 08:35, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
  • Oh... okay, thanks. I totally forgot about the AT--Realistic 08:39, 18 April 2010 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://heroeswiki.ddns.net/index.php?title=Talk:Electric_manipulation&oldid=170980"