This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Kensei sword: Difference between revisions

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
imported>Baldbobbo
imported>Ryangibsonstewart
Line 37: Line 37:
* I just find it confusing to add the past history (17th century events) to the end of an article called "Hiro's Sword." After Hiro returns to the 21st Century, the events occurring in the beginning of Season Two will become a section on the sword's 17th Century past in the middle of its 21st Century history. I don't know if the correct answer is to rename the page and put the story in chronological order, broken by sections, ''or'' if we should make the events surrounding the sword, as seen in the 16th Century, a separate sub-division, but I '''do''' think we should articulate it more clearly so that someone reading the history of the sword during the middle of Season Four can follow both the history and the storyline clearly. Am I making any sense? I don't feel like I'm making sense. --[[User:Danielandthelions|Danielandthelions]] 14:34, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
* I just find it confusing to add the past history (17th century events) to the end of an article called "Hiro's Sword." After Hiro returns to the 21st Century, the events occurring in the beginning of Season Two will become a section on the sword's 17th Century past in the middle of its 21st Century history. I don't know if the correct answer is to rename the page and put the story in chronological order, broken by sections, ''or'' if we should make the events surrounding the sword, as seen in the 16th Century, a separate sub-division, but I '''do''' think we should articulate it more clearly so that someone reading the history of the sword during the middle of Season Four can follow both the history and the storyline clearly. Am I making any sense? I don't feel like I'm making sense. --[[User:Danielandthelions|Danielandthelions]] 14:34, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
** Although it's essentially the same sword, I think that perhaps we should have this article chronicle the sword while in Hiro or Future Hiro's possession, while another article, Kensei's sword, chronicles it when it is owned by Kensei and then kept by the Linderman Group (although technically owned by Linderman, I'd say it's collected by Linderman, possessed by Kensei, making it Kensei's sword). This would prevent some confusion, and have the see also links.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 14:41, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
** Although it's essentially the same sword, I think that perhaps we should have this article chronicle the sword while in Hiro or Future Hiro's possession, while another article, Kensei's sword, chronicles it when it is owned by Kensei and then kept by the Linderman Group (although technically owned by Linderman, I'd say it's collected by Linderman, possessed by Kensei, making it Kensei's sword). This would prevent some confusion, and have the see also links.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 14:41, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
***Kind of like the double articles we have for [[Hiro]] and [[Future Hiro]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:25, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:25, 5 October 2007

Tim Kring interview

  • The note about Tim Kring's interview could really use a citation if anyone has it. --Fcphantom 21:36, 6 December 2006 (EST)
  • could someone confirm this quote? Can't remeber exactly what he said:

"It's a fake! I'll go give it back"

Thanks, Heroe 17:11, 23 January 2007 (EST)

The ARG pic

I'm not sure if extra show information such as Heroes 360 can be added here, but I added the sword pict from the linderman casino website. Delete it if necessary! --FrenchFlo(talk)(contribs) 05:18, 26 February 2007 (EST)

  • This is fine to include on the Heroes360 stuff. If it's on a page that is identified as Heroes360 (such as corinthianlasvegas.com), then it can be added at will. If it's on a main page (such as Hiro's sword), then it should somehow note where it comes from (and generally doesn't belong in the episodic history). — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2007 (EST)

Concentration Image

Have we got a picture of Hiro with his face all scrunched up? I was thinking we might want to do a "before/after" thing regarding his use of the sword as a focus for his powers. --Ted C 09:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)

  • Y'know, this just furthers my belief that the sword is just a placebo.--Hardvice (talk) 14:06, 9 March 2007 (EST)
    • I'm not so sure these pics should be on this page. Only the serene one has anything to do with the sword directly. And it's really speculation to say how much effort he's using. I would simply take them out of the gallery and put them as image links in the notes. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:42, 9 March 2007 (EST)

Think we should rename this page?

Or Redirect it? The sword is called the "Kensei"... and I know that's also the name of the guy who originally wielded it, but if you look it up, Kensei is a type of sword, and the guy in last nights episode called it the Kensei himself. --Riddler 14:17, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

  • I think just a redirect would be sufficient. Most people probably still think of it as Hiro's sword. --Ted C 14:33, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
  • I think he was calling it the "Kensei sword" the same way people would call a painting by Renoir "the Renoir".--Hardvice (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

still "Hiro's Sword"?

  • Do we leave it as "Hiro's Sword" because he had possession of it last? Kensei "currently" has possession of it, even if "currently" is 329 years ago. Linderman had possession for a lot longer before Hiro stole it. Technically, the sword belongs to the Linderman Estate and is stolen property in the year 2007. Unless someone can show me where Linderman told Hiro he could keep it... This would be much easier if the sword had a name, like Excalibur. Perhaps the "Godsend Sword"? I'm seeing a lot more support in Season 2 for calling this "Kensei's Sword."--Danielandthelions 11:47, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
  • I don't care one way or another (though I wouldn't call it "Godsend Sword" since it's never really been called that anywhere). -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
    • Good point. Still like "Kensei's Sword," though I now realize that the title "Hiro's Sword" came about to set it apart from Ando's sword.
  • I just find it confusing to add the past history (17th century events) to the end of an article called "Hiro's Sword." After Hiro returns to the 21st Century, the events occurring in the beginning of Season Two will become a section on the sword's 17th Century past in the middle of its 21st Century history. I don't know if the correct answer is to rename the page and put the story in chronological order, broken by sections, or if we should make the events surrounding the sword, as seen in the 16th Century, a separate sub-division, but I do think we should articulate it more clearly so that someone reading the history of the sword during the middle of Season Four can follow both the history and the storyline clearly. Am I making any sense? I don't feel like I'm making sense. --Danielandthelions 14:34, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
    • Although it's essentially the same sword, I think that perhaps we should have this article chronicle the sword while in Hiro or Future Hiro's possession, while another article, Kensei's sword, chronicles it when it is owned by Kensei and then kept by the Linderman Group (although technically owned by Linderman, I'd say it's collected by Linderman, possessed by Kensei, making it Kensei's sword). This would prevent some confusion, and have the see also links.--Bob 14:41, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://heroeswiki.ddns.net/index.php?title=Talk:Kensei_sword&oldid=302150"