Talk:Blood recipients: Difference between revisions
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
imported>SacValleyDweller →Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: new section |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST) |
Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST) |
||
* I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST) |
* I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST) |
||
== Is [[Genesis]] REALLY the first example? == |
|||
I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention." |
|||
Revision as of 04:06, 1 September 2008
Shouldn't the lead image of this article be ... a blood recipient?
And while we're on the subject of changes to the article, this should probably be converted to a list and renamed "list of blood recipients". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:07, 4 December 2007 (EST)
- Agreed.--Bob (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Maybe Mr. Muggles should be a note? He didn't take it into his blood stream the same way everyone else did. Any thoughts?--Riddler 23:04, 1 January 2008 (EST)
- Good catch--I didn't see him in the main section of the page. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2008 (EST)
Separate "super blood"
Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--Bob (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Is Genesis REALLY the first example?
I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until (The Hard Part). I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."