This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.

Talk:Blood recipients

From Heroes Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shouldn't the lead image of this article be ... a blood recipient?

And while we're on the subject of changes to the article, this should probably be converted to a list and renamed "list of blood recipients". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 19:07, 4 December 2007 (EST)

  • Agreed.--Bob (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2007 (EST)
  • Maybe Mr. Muggles should be a note? He didn't take it into his blood stream the same way everyone else did. Any thoughts?--Riddler 23:04, 1 January 2008 (EST)
    • Good catch--I didn't see him in the main section of the page. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2008 (EST)

Separate "super blood"

Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--Bob (talk) 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)

  • I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?

I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until (The Hard Part). I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--SacValleyDweller (talk) 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

  • I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--MiamiVolts (talk) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
    • I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--SacValleyDweller (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
      • Doesn't matter to me. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
      • Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--MiamiVolts (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
        • I was talking about the infobox, yes. If no one objects, I'll change the first mention to "The Hard Part" tomorrow.--SacValleyDweller (talk) 01:50, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://heroeswiki.ddns.net/index.php?title=Talk:Blood_recipients&oldid=170567"