This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Heroes: The Official Magazine: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Ryangibsonstewart No edit summary |
imported>Ryangibsonstewart |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
So I got a subscription for this for Christmas (yay!) and as I was reading this, I wondered where exactly this would fit in terms of canonicity. I'm thinking near-canon (oh by the way, according to the magazine ''[[Godsend]]'' took place on October 12th). --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 19:56, 26 December 2007 (EST) |
So I got a subscription for this for Christmas (yay!) and as I was reading this, I wondered where exactly this would fit in terms of canonicity. I'm thinking near-canon (oh by the way, according to the magazine ''[[Godsend]]'' took place on October 12th). --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 19:56, 26 December 2007 (EST) |
||
*I don't have the magazine, so I can't speak empirically, but I would say that the interviews would be considered the same as the interviews from other sources. I assume there is no new "story", so it would not be on the same level as a graphic novel or Heroes Evolutions. If there is new information (like the date of ''Godsend''), if it can be verified that it came from a writer or director or another crew member, then I would consider the information to be on par with the [[episode commentaries]] or a [[ |
*I don't have the magazine, so I can't speak empirically, but I would say that the interviews would be considered the same as the interviews from other sources. I assume there is no new "story", so it would not be on the same level as a graphic novel or Heroes Evolutions. If there is new information (like the date of ''Godsend''), if it can be verified that it came from a writer or director or another crew member, then I would consider the information to be on par with the [[episode commentaries]] or a [[CBR]] Q&A. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:41, 26 December 2007 (EST) |
||
Revision as of 04:42, 27 December 2007
Magazine
- Already purchased and looking forward to its arrival! (Admin 01:38, 31 October 2007 (EDT))
- I can see myself in a few years owning a stack of these.--Citizen 12:39, 31 October 2007
Lead Image
...needs to be 450x350.--Hardvice (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2007 (EDT)
- I've been looking for an image that can be cropped, but it's not easy. I was trying to crop the premiere issue front page to include the logo but you get a bit of the main title, so that's no good.-- Lost Soul talk contribs 15:22, 10 November 2007 (EST)
Release today
So we should expect this article to grow if it is released today. We might want to include a list for sections and all new canon details hiding inside the magazine. -- Riffsyphon1024 13:54, 20 November 2007 (EST)
Canonicity
So I got a subscription for this for Christmas (yay!) and as I was reading this, I wondered where exactly this would fit in terms of canonicity. I'm thinking near-canon (oh by the way, according to the magazine Godsend took place on October 12th). --Hero!(talk)(contribs) 19:56, 26 December 2007 (EST)
- I don't have the magazine, so I can't speak empirically, but I would say that the interviews would be considered the same as the interviews from other sources. I assume there is no new "story", so it would not be on the same level as a graphic novel or Heroes Evolutions. If there is new information (like the date of Godsend), if it can be verified that it came from a writer or director or another crew member, then I would consider the information to be on par with the episode commentaries or a CBR Q&A. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:41, 26 December 2007 (EST)