This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Oil secretion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Laughingdevilboy m →Tar?: reply |
imported>Steelymcbeam m →Tar? |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
**** Maybe we should just change it anyway, we know tar wouldn't have the effects demonstrated, so it is more likely to be oil.--{{User:Steelymcbeam/sig}} 16:42, 17 March 2009 (EDT) |
**** Maybe we should just change it anyway, we know tar wouldn't have the effects demonstrated, so it is more likely to be oil.--{{User:Steelymcbeam/sig}} 16:42, 17 March 2009 (EDT) |
||
***** I agree. --{{User:Laughingdevilboy/signature}} 20:47, 17 March 2009 (GMT) |
***** I agree. --{{User:Laughingdevilboy/signature}} 20:47, 17 March 2009 (GMT) |
||
******So should we just go ahead?--{{User:Steelymcbeam/sig}} 16:49, 17 March 2009 (EDT) |
|||
Revision as of 20:49, 17 March 2009
Tar?
Tar is actually very sticky, so I don't think this is an appropriate name. Maybe oil slick emission. --Watchmaker 11:38, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- I would say oil emission, considering his nickname was said to be "slick", it would make sense it was oil, as in an oil slick. --Ross R. Smith 12:16, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- My first thought was oil, but not tar. Tar is heavy + sticky --IronyUTC CH 12:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- Definitely agree personally, but it could be any black liquid.--Riddler 12:44, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- I think we should ask RGS to see if he can e-mail to see what it was wrote in as. --IronyUTC CH 12:45, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- I agree Gabriel Bishop 12:50, 17 March 2009 (EDT) Gabriel Bishop
- Maybe we should just change it anyway, we know tar wouldn't have the effects demonstrated, so it is more likely to be oil.--Steely McBeam - (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- I agree. --posted by Laughingdevilboy
- Maybe we should just change it anyway, we know tar wouldn't have the effects demonstrated, so it is more likely to be oil.--Steely McBeam - (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
- I agree Gabriel Bishop 12:50, 17 March 2009 (EDT) Gabriel Bishop
- My first thought was oil, but not tar. Tar is heavy + sticky --IronyUTC CH 12:30, 17 March 2009 (EDT)
Talk 20:47, 17 March 2009 (GMT)
- So should we just go ahead?--Steely McBeam - (talk) 16:49, 17 March 2009 (EDT)