This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Hardvice m I guess they changed custom sigs. :( |
imported>Ohmyn0 No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Red |
==Red Link== |
||
*I think leaving red ink isn't an entirely bad thing when writing an article since we can always check the list of "wanted articles" and people will always be checking up on them and adding stubs where needed. I'd personally suggest rewording "Either write an entire article, or a brief summary and add the "stubs" template to it" to make it clear that it's more of a suggestion than a rule. One nice thing about the "wanted articles" is that you get the number of pages requesting that article so it's possible to determine the saliency of the request. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 02:25, 7 November 2006 (EST)) |
*I think leaving red ink isn't an entirely bad thing when writing an article since we can always check the list of "wanted articles" and people will always be checking up on them and adding stubs where needed. I'd personally suggest rewording "Either write an entire article, or a brief summary and add the "stubs" template to it" to make it clear that it's more of a suggestion than a rule. One nice thing about the "wanted articles" is that you get the number of pages requesting that article so it's possible to determine the saliency of the request. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 02:25, 7 November 2006 (EST)) |
||
**I agree. I'd rather have no article than a bad article in most cases. Also, there will be times when we just can't meaningfully add even a stub, like [[Charlie]].--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]][[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]] 02:29, 7 November 2006 (EST) |
**I agree. I'd rather have no article than a bad article in most cases. Also, there will be times when we just can't meaningfully add even a stub, like [[Charlie]].--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]][[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]] 02:29, 7 November 2006 (EST) |
||
In that case, It will be removed and replaced with Wikitext usage. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 22:44, 16 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
==Theories Tab== |
|||
Originally proposed by [[User:ZyberGoat|ZyberGoat]]. |
|||
* I think that's a pretty good idea. --[[User:Heroe|Heroe]] |
|||
*'''Not yet''' It would probably require more work than it would be used for, and they theories do not yet rival the lengths of the articles as they did on Lostpedia. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 22:44, 16 November 2006 (EST) |
|||
Revision as of 03:44, 17 November 2006
Red Link
- I think leaving red ink isn't an entirely bad thing when writing an article since we can always check the list of "wanted articles" and people will always be checking up on them and adding stubs where needed. I'd personally suggest rewording "Either write an entire article, or a brief summary and add the "stubs" template to it" to make it clear that it's more of a suggestion than a rule. One nice thing about the "wanted articles" is that you get the number of pages requesting that article so it's possible to determine the saliency of the request. (Admin 02:25, 7 November 2006 (EST))
In that case, It will be removed and replaced with Wikitext usage. ---- 
22:44, 16 November 2006 (EST)
Theories Tab
Originally proposed by ZyberGoat.
- I think that's a pretty good idea. --Heroe
- Not yet It would probably require more work than it would be used for, and they theories do not yet rival the lengths of the articles as they did on Lostpedia. ----
22:44, 16 November 2006 (EST)