This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Spoiler talk:Other: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>HiroDynoSlayer Added category differentiation |
imported>Havoc No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
So, should we assume spoilerfix.com is accurate and reliable? Should we go ahead and make spoiler articles for these eps? (By the way, does anybody else think that these titles could double as really good porn titles?) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT) |
So, should we assume spoilerfix.com is accurate and reliable? Should we go ahead and make spoiler articles for these eps? (By the way, does anybody else think that these titles could double as really good porn titles?) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 21:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
*I particularly think the Exploding Man would be quite the porn title.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 22:58, 19 March 2007 (EDT) |
*I particularly think the Exploding Man would be quite the porn title.--[[User:Baldbobbo|Bob]] 22:58, 19 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
**What about "The Hard Part"? ;) --[[User:Havoc|Havoc]] 04:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT) |
|||
* Maybe if it was G-String Theory. --[[User:Xmuskrat|Xmuskrat]] 09:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
* Maybe if it was G-String Theory. --[[User:Xmuskrat|Xmuskrat]] 09:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
* We have separate confirmation on several of these from Herosite (though they could have the same source), and separate confirmation about ''String Theory'' from [[Adrian Pasdar]] thanks to ''Pull Stuff Randomly Out of Your Ass with Kristin''. I'd say that's enough to add spoiler articles. We can always move them later and say "the story changed!"--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
* We have separate confirmation on several of these from Herosite (though they could have the same source), and separate confirmation about ''String Theory'' from [[Adrian Pasdar]] thanks to ''Pull Stuff Randomly Out of Your Ass with Kristin''. I'd say that's enough to add spoiler articles. We can always move them later and say "the story changed!"--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 08:22, 5 April 2007
Spoilers from other sites should be paraphrased, not cut-and-pasted. Even with a source attributed, that's just asking for copyright trouble.--Hardvice (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
- It's okay to cut and paste a quote, right? As long as it's something they are reporting somebody said. It's just the words in between that need to be re-written. --Xmuskrat 09:10, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Correct. It's even OK to quote the reporting site itself, as long as it's a quote (i.e. between quotations marks and attributed to the "speaker".) For example, if Kristin Veitch wrote "Peter is going to die of an infected toenail and Claire will become a lesbian nun", this could be recorded several ways:
- According to Kristin Veitch, "Peter is going to die of an infected toenail and Claire will become a lesbian nun". (link)
- Kristin Veitch reports that Peter will suffer a fatal infected toenail, while Claire will simultaneously become a lesbian and a nun. (link)
- Peter is going to die of an infected toenail and Claire will become a lesbian nun. (link)
- The first two are acceptable: #1 is a properly-attributed quote, and #2 is a paraphrase. #3 is what people have been doing lately, and that's not OK since it's copied but not labeled as a quote.--Hardvice (talk) 14:01, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Correct. It's even OK to quote the reporting site itself, as long as it's a quote (i.e. between quotations marks and attributed to the "speaker".) For example, if Kristin Veitch wrote "Peter is going to die of an infected toenail and Claire will become a lesbian nun", this could be recorded several ways:
Wizard World Q&A session Spoiler
- Wait, Sylar didn't get Eden's power. Why is it listed? Peter met Eden so he probably has it but he didn't get it from Sylar. Bkdelong 16:51, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
- Yes, Peter met Eden in Collision, as credited. --HiroDynoSlayer (talk) 04/4/2007 17:22 (EST)
- Wait, Sylar didn't get Eden's power. Why is it listed? Peter met Eden so he probably has it but he didn't get it from Sylar. Bkdelong 16:51, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
Episodes 19-23
So, should we assume spoilerfix.com is accurate and reliable? Should we go ahead and make spoiler articles for these eps? (By the way, does anybody else think that these titles could double as really good porn titles?) — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 21:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- I particularly think the Exploding Man would be quite the porn title.--Bob 22:58, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- What about "The Hard Part"? ;) --Havoc 04:22, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe if it was G-String Theory. --Xmuskrat 09:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- We have separate confirmation on several of these from Herosite (though they could have the same source), and separate confirmation about String Theory from Adrian Pasdar thanks to Pull Stuff Randomly Out of Your Ass with Kristin. I'd say that's enough to add spoiler articles. We can always move them later and say "the story changed!"--Hardvice (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)